Search:

A good point and you may be right. I say may only because I bought it directly from the distributor off of an ad in Shotgun News in 1962. So far as I know I'm the first civilian owner.

My present thinking is that I will keep the rifle as is. The wood, while mismatched, is original and has a history of its own. To replace it with modern reproductions doesn't seem right to me. I...

Interesting, I wonder what was the reason was for retro-conversion. Thanks to you both for the insights.

Thanks, Paul, I'll have to think about returning it to its original dress or just enjoy it as it is. The bore is really good and the action is tight so it works well for plinking on the range. ...

Hi, another newbie here. I'd like some info from the experts here on a mail order Enfield I bought in 1962. According to collar markings it's a BSA Mark III*= made in 1917. All the metal parts...