+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Disturbing new revision to regulations regarding storage of "explosives"

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Sapper740's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Last On
    Today @ 03:09 AM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    577
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    03:01 AM

    Disturbing new revision to regulations regarding storage of "explosives"

    On August 11th, 2023 The U.S. Attorney General revised 27 CFR 555.201 para. (f) to read:

    (f) Any person who stores explosive materials shall notify the authority having jurisdiction for fire safety in the locality in which the explosive materials are being stored of the type of explosives, magazine capacity, and location of each site where such explosive materials are stored. Notification shall be made orally before the end of the day on which storage of the explosive materials commenced, and in writing within 48 hours from the time such storage commenced. Thereafter, written notification shall be made once every 12 months following the initial notification, but no later than the end of the month during which the 12-month period is completed, unless the person is no longer storing explosive materials at the relevant site. When a person ceases to store explosive materials at a site, written notification to the authority having jurisdiction for fire safety in the locality in which the explosive materials were stored shall be made within 48 hours of the person discontinuing storage. Each written notification must also contain the name, title, and agency of the fire authority official notified and the date of the written notification. A copy of each written notification must be maintained by the person submitting the notification for five years from the date of notification and made available for examination or inspection by an ATF officer at all reasonable times.

    Dated: August 11, 2023.

    Merrick B. Garland,

    Attorney General.

    No problem, you say? Smokeless powder is a propellant, not an "explosive" you say? Not according to our Federal Government which lists 'smokeless powder' as an 'explosive' on p.77890 Volume 87 No. 243 of the Federal Register.

    S
    Safety fuse.
    Salts of organic amino sulfonic acid
    explosive mixture.
    Salutes (bulk).
    Silver acetylide.
    Silver azide.
    Silver fulminate.
    Silver oxalate explosive mixtures.
    Silver styphnate.
    Silver tartrate explosive mixtures.
    Silver tetrazene.
    Slurried explosive mixtures of water,
    inorganic oxidizing salt, gelling agent,
    fuel, and sensitizer (cap sensitive).
    Smokeless powder.
    Sodatol.
    Sodium amatol.
    Sodium azide explosive mixture.
    Sodium dinitro-ortho-cresolate.
    Sodium nitrate explosive mixtures.
    Sodium nitrate-potassium nitrate
    explosive mixture.
    Sodium picramate.
    Squibs.
    Styphnic acid explosives.

    Has anyone heard more on this? It sounds like a back-door method to institute limitations on our hobby.

  2. Thank You to Sapper740 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    painter777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    5,327
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    04:01 AM
    Charlie-Painter777

    A Country Has No Greater Responsibility Than To Care For Those Who Served...

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to painter777 For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Contributing Member Low & Slow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Last On
    Today @ 12:07 AM
    Location
    colorado usa
    Posts
    360
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM
    Oh, boy. Don't like the sound of this at all. It does seem in line with the sort of tactics currently in fashion. Such apparently minor changes in mundane bureaucratic regs can easily fly under the radar. "Any person" doesn't appear to be restricted to businesses.
    Last edited by Low & Slow; 09-06-2023 at 12:04 AM.

  7. #4
    Advisory Panel Lee Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 02:54 AM
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    1,828
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM
    Better look up primers.

  8. #5
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    05-11-2024 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,774
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    04:01 PM
    Yep welcome to our world the Govt slowly and as insipient as an asp slowly slowly grinding away at ones hobby until we are reduced to sticks with a bang tag on the end.
    Our last lot of legislation for West Au added another few calibers to the banned list taking it up to 64 now I think with more to follow I've just gone through the hoops of my munitions collection storage having to show the safes, locking mechs, anchor points with 40x40x2mm washers (I have 50x50x3mm washers) dynabolts 10mm x 75mm with extra 4 in each safe.
    Along with all the info on our armour filmed glass, window locks, no entry stainless steel sliding doors, CCTV & motion alarms yeah allot of hoops to jump through.

    All of us are suffering in the pursuant of our hobby but cars kill more ppl in Aus than firearms but the public is immune to those stats as thats just another car crash but if it's an F/A offence the whole world has to know.

  9. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to CINDERS For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Advisory Panel
    painter777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    5,327
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    04:01 AM

    Is smokeless powder used in small arms ammunition subject to storage requirements

    Is smokeless powder designed for use in small arms ammunition subject to the explosives storage requirements?

    Smokeless powders designed for use in small arms ammunition are exempt from regulation under 18 U.S.iconC. Chapter 40 and the regulations in 27 CFR Part 555. Packaging that readily identifies the smokeless powder as being designed for use in small arms ammunition may help in determining whether it is entitled to the exemption.

    Smokeless powder designed for use other than in small arms ammunition, and explosive products such as squibs, fireworks, theatrical special effects, or other articles that may contain smokeless powders, are regulated and must be stored pursuant to the regulations at 27 CFR 555, Subpart K – Storage.

    Source: Is smokeless powder designed for use in small arms ammunition subject to the explosives storage requirements? | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

    The current rule and proposed rule will impact those that are in the business, ATF estimates there are 9,674 licensees and permittees. They will have to deal with the extra paperwork and labor costs.

    Current rule:
    Any person {License or permit holder} who stores explosive materials shall notify the authority having jurisdiction for fire safety in the locality in which the explosive materials are being stored of the type, magazine capacity, and location of each site where such explosive materials are stored. Such notification shall be made orally before the end of the day on which storage of the explosive materials commenced and in writing within 48 hours from the time such storage commenced.

    Proposed new rule:?
    Any person {License or permit holder} who stores explosive materials shall notify the authority having jurisdiction for fire safety in the locality in which the explosive materials are being stored of the type of explosives, magazine capacity, and location of each site where such explosive materials are stored. Notification shall be made orally before the end of the day on which storage of the explosive materials commenced, and in writing within 48 hours from the time such storage commenced. Thereafter, written notification shall be made once every 12 months following the initial notification, but no later than the end of the month during which the 12-month period is completed, unless the person is no longer storing explosive materials at the relevant site. When a person ceases to store explosive materials at a site, written notification to the authority having jurisdiction for fire safety in the locality in which the explosive materials were stored shall be made within 48 hours of the person discontinuing storage. Each written notification must also contain the name, title, and agency of the fire authority official notified and the date of the written notification. A copy of each written notification must be maintained by the person submitting the notification for five years from the date of notification and made available for examination or inspection by an ATF officer at all reasonable times.?

    The ATF's use of the word Person instead of Licensee or Permit holder gives me some pause. Is that a foot in the door?
    Also the double meaning of Smokeless Powder could have been better clarified.

    Seems their stated purpose for this change is for:
    This annual notification will increase public safety through increased communication between storers of explosive materials and their local emergency responders, provide updated storage information to local authorities, and allow for risk assessments and emergency response preparation prior to incidents, thus reducing potential safety and damage risk to first responders and emergency equipment, respectively.

    Anyone else feel the panic buying going on right about now? A week from now.... A month ?
    Last edited by painter777; 09-06-2023 at 06:46 PM.
    Charlie-Painter777

    A Country Has No Greater Responsibility Than To Care For Those Who Served...

  11. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to painter777 For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:22 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,014
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    01:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by painter777 View Post
    Anyone else feel the panic buying going on right about now? A week from now.... A month ?
    Well, we already can't get much of anything and once people read this...Canadians usually can't differentiate between US regs and Canadianicon regs so whatever's still available will disappear.
    Regards, Jim

  13. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  14. #8
    Contributing Member Atticus Thraxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Last On
    10-14-2023 @ 09:51 AM
    Location
    Yolo County CA
    Age
    61
    Posts
    150
    Real Name
    GEORGE
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    01:01 AM
    I can’t and won’t recommend anyone break any law. But there does come a time when I feel not only morally justified, but morally required to ignore incipient regulation whose only purpose is to deprive me from/of peacefully enjoying my freedom. ????????????, ????????????, ????????????, ????????????.
    Last edited by Atticus Thraxx; 09-06-2023 at 10:46 PM. Reason: Spell
    I have a lot more experience than expertise, still have both eyes and most of my fingers though.

  15. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Atticus Thraxx For This Useful Post:


  16. #9
    Contributing Member Low & Slow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Last On
    Today @ 12:07 AM
    Location
    colorado usa
    Posts
    360
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM
    Zipping lips to refrain from possible anti-bureaucratic political observations.

  17. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Low & Slow For This Useful Post:


  18. #10
    Legacy Member HOOKED ON HISTORY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    MS/USA
    Posts
    4,012
    Local Date
    05-25-2024
    Local Time
    03:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Low & Slow View Post
    Zipping lips to refrain from possible anti-bureaucratic political observations.
    Can't be punished for thoughts.
    Yet.

  19. Thank You to HOOKED ON HISTORY For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 10:50 AM
  2. Warner Brothers "Break Downs" and "Blow Ups" 1936-1947
    By Badger in forum Old Time Movie Classics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-02-2013, 07:54 AM
  3. SAVAGE "S" in details, "ILCO butt trap", "P" on bayonet stud,what co. was ILCO?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 07:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts