-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Are these markings unusual?
It looks like this 1917 MkIII* was sold to India at some time but there are just a bunch of stamps on this old piece. Anything unusual?
link http://www.auctionarms.com/search/di...um=9353469&oh=
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
10-05-2009 01:38 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Possibly Ghurka issue. The bayonet is a WW II refinish Admiralty contract.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
jona, I'm bayonet stupid, how can you tell? TIA
Klondike, I think it may be an ex Iraq rifle. Someone will correct me.
Brad
-
Legacy Member
The WSC marking was only used by Wilkinson in WW II, and their only P-07 contract during WW II was for the Admiralty(for about 200,000 reconditioned/refurbished P-07 bayonets).
-
Thank You to jona For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
A quick look online at Hindu, Punjab and Arabic script makes me guess the later. Now would the Iraqis have proofed their rifles?
-
Legacy Member
The mark on the leftside of the buttsocket is an Ishapore rebuild mark----a total rebuild, including a barrel replacement, in most cases.
The mark on the rightside of the receiver is a set of three numbers---"194" done in a Tibetan script sometimes used in Nepal.
So go with Gurkha.
-----krinko
PS. Source for the Tibetan script information is "South Asian Coins and Paper Money" by Bruce, Deyell, Rhodes and Spengler.
Last edited by krinko; 10-06-2009 at 07:47 PM.
Reason: PS-ing
-
Thank You to krinko For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thank you for all of the help, it piqued my curiosity. Now to do a little reading on modern Nepal history.