Long Branch serial number listing

[garyohartnett]

1950 95L3245
walnut ,tiger stripe stock.
CMk4 sight.
steel butt plate .
original (?)cleaning kit in stock, plastic ,black oil bottle .
6 groove barrel ,right hand twist.
all matching .
but forestock butchered by previous owner to take a central range sight .I have and original mint complete set of furniture which I will fit one day
trigger sear is a rof from a no5 and smoothed etc . I have an original which I will fit one day .

in its current set up shoots moa with fmj hand loads (and cast also) out 200 metres.

which is why I am reluctant to change anything.

[Enfield Novice]

Just bought it today.
1942 No4 Mk1*
Wood looks like walnut very dark
Serial# 16L7171 All Matching
Other imprints on receiver are
CAI ST. A.VT.
303-B-CANADA
VG Condition all over appears hardly fired.

[fireweed]

I have a 1943 Long Branch ser no. 573466.

---------- Post added at 03:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:35 PM ----------

I have a 1943 Long Branch ser no. 57L3466.

[DiverDriver]

Hello, I have a Longbranch 1942 No4 Mk1 (no *) 1L5189. Has transitional parts like a milled hole in bolt handle and Mk1 style cocking piece and of course the milled micrometer sight.

Also have:

1943 N04Mk1* #25L6944
1949 No4 Mk1* #91L0174 (DCRA conversion by Longbranch 7.62mm #1156)

[Dupond de France]

Hi, I join the club with my 1942 N°4 mk1* Attachment 49734Attachment 49735serial 14Lxxxx, steel butt-plate, MK1 rear sight, grooved hand guard, new after war 2 grooves barrel, all matching numbers including magazine and stock.
Very nice rifle despite a bolt body issue.

Awaiting N°4 mk1* 2Lxxxx, early 1942, same as above but 5 grooves barrel.

[repto]

I have a 1949 Long Branch No.4 Mk 1* 91L3620 which I was told was ex-canadian police when I bought it about 20 years ago.

[milsp45]

My poor Long Branch has certainly had an interesting life and is sadly probably beyond any historic value.

S/No: 54L40XX

Marked No 4 Mk 1 * Long Branch 1943

It is then stamped with ENGLAND which from my reading here means at some stage it was imported as surplus into the US.

It subsequently made it's way to Australia as it is stamped CAS for the Lithgow/Sportco conversion to 7.62mm

When I purchased it it had a Sportco butt stock which may have been fitted at the same time as the conversion. The forewood has also been cut away about 1/2 inch in front of the sling band.

At some stage after its 7.62 conversion it has subsequently been re-worked to .223 calibre and fitted with a heavy target barrel.

So it has 2 empty holes on the side for the original .303 extractor screw and slightly forward of that the 7.62 extractor screw. It also has some other screw holes that look like they were from mounting target sights and a scope at some stage.

This is the state I bought it in. It was fitted with a regular magazine (that obviously didn't work with .223) and while it extracted fine, the spent shells just dropped into the chamber. As well as a non-matching bolt.

Since purchase I have sourced and fitted an old 5 round magazine from a Sportco .222 factory SMLE conversion which works perfectly and replaced the bolt head with one sourced from "Craig Whitsey Gun Makers" in the UK which gives proper ejection.

It is beautifully accurate, a lot of fun and goes well beside my .22 trainer. It just won't be wining any historical accuracy awards.

[Seaforth72]

The following C No. 7 Mk. I Lee-Enfield .22" rifles were, and may still be, on issue to 583 Squadron, Royal Canadian Air Cadets in Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada as of 2001-02-22. I was the Deputy Commanding Officer, was a Range Officer and was responsible for the inventory of the firearms.

I painted rack numbers on the rifle butts, in white paint as I recall, numbers 1 to 12. Our inventory location was AA7113.


1 ---- 1L5699
2 ---- 1L9242
3 ---- 1L3750
4 ---- 1L9790
5 ---- 1L9309
6 --- 20L0872
7 --- 20L557 NOT SERVICEABLE - "Azimuth screw N/S. No mag."
8 --- 20L0871
9 --- 20L450
10 -- 20L659
11 -- 20L575
12 -- 20L586


These numbers are EXACTLY AS STAMPED ON THE RIFLES. For all twelve rifles listed above, the serial numbers matched (rifle and bolt).

We did not have the transit chests for these by the way.

Sadly there was a move to using pellet guns instead of the .22" rifles. The pellet guns were junk and one that I picked up had the pot-metal rear sight fall off!

There was a funny side to the rifle model number. At the time, Canadian Forces' service rifle was the C7 in 5.56mm, a full automatic Canadian made version of the M16 rifle. Headquarters sent us a list of rifles held by us, requesting "Quarterly Stocktaking of Small Arms." 1 page listed the 12 CNo7 Mk. I rifles that we held. There was another page attached listing a batch of C7 rifles! My response to HQ was to ask "When may we expect the delivery of the C7 5.56mm full automatic assault rifles for the 583 Sqn Royal Canadian Air Cadets?"

The stocktaking list consisted of "RIFLECAL22WE" (presumably decoding as Rifle, calibre 22, with equipment.) Note that they did NOT identify the rifles by their official model number! Believe it or not, the manufacturing year is officially recorded for ALL of them as 1986! This appears to be the date the Department of National Defence computer records were created, i.e. "DATE INTO = 26JAN86" These rifles were actually made in the mid-1940s and the very early 1950s.

The NATO stock number (NSN) for these C. No. 7 Mk. I rifles is 1005-21-103-1203.

Interestingly I found one bolt was mismatched to a rifle. Knowing that the rifles held by the army cadets and the air cadets were sometimes lent to the other unit, I investigated and found that the local Army Cadet unit had that rifle, we had their bolt and they had our bolt. The serial numbers were very close, only differing in the last two digits. I corrected the error ASAP.

The cadets also used these rifles for drill. At the Annual Inspection a cadet drill team, including my daughter who was a Cadet Sergeant, performed superbly. I insisted that they use proper Lee-Enfield drill instead of the FN C1A1 rifle drill which had foolishly been used because that was the "modern way" - except that these rifles do no have a pistol grip and it was crazy and dangerous to expect cadets to hold that weight with a couple of fingers through the trigger guard! I photocopied original Canadian Army Drill Manuals covering the Lee-Enfield rifle for their use. The cadets also used these rifles for Remembrance Day sentry duty at the cenotaph and as target rifles.

An order came out prohibiting the cadets from using these rifles for drill. When I asked why, a senior officer at Headquarters said "Because little Suzie might drop it on her foot." Ironically my daughter is named Suzie, was a Sergeant, and she handled the rifle far better than this Major could have! As a result of the written orders that the cadets were NOT allowed to do ANY RIFLE DRILL, we declined a very prominent request for cadets for Remembrance Day. Our polite refusal included copies of two official HQ documents banning the cadets from performing ANY rifle drill. I explained to the group that had requested our services that this ban left us two only options:
1. Cadet without rifle could march to the Cenotaph, take post without rifle and stand at attention. An officer could then come out and place a rifle in his/her right hand. The cadet would not be permitted to reverse arms or stand at ease etc. as those were drill movements and were now banned. The officer would retrieve the rifle at the end of the service and then the cadet could march away.
2. Cadet with rifle could saunter up to the cenotaph, dragging his or her rifle, then stand at attention. Again they could not reverse arms etc. At the end of the service the cadet could saunter off dragging the rifle (thus avoiding any drill movements.)

I stated, with my CO's full agreement, that this would be an insult to the veterans, to the war dead and degrading for the cadets (and their officers!). The **** hit the fan as we had hoped and HQ said that they did not mean to exclude the annual November 11th Remembrance Day and the rehearsals for this! Their written orders and notification letter however were unambiguous. We replied that their written orders CLEARLY stated the cadets could perform NO DRILL, PERIOD - no ifs ands or buts. My CO and I each had our Canadian Forces Decoration (long service medals for 12 years of service by then) so being appalled at the idiocy of Headquarters (surely not a new feeling in the military!) figured we had a point to make. Besides, we were reservists there to lead the cadets, and did not give a damn about protecting our assess (aka careers) as is too often the case in the regular military.

[stencollector]

6 --- 20L0872
7 --- 20L557 [/SIZE] NOT SERVICEABLE - "Azimuth screw N/S. No mag." [SIZE="5"]
8 --- 20L0871
9 --- 20L450
10 -- 20L659
11 -- 20L575
12 -- 20L586
.

Interesting serial numbers. They are not in the regular Cno7 range, nor do they follow the normal format for Long Branch numbering. Without seeing the rifles themselves to see dates or if they for some reason had been renumbered, or assembled at a third or second line level, they will remain an anomoly.

[rickert53]

Just picked up 1942 Mk4*1 18L 7640. Grooved rear fore stock, 300/600 flip sight. Savage trigger guard, rebarreled in 53. FTR mark on barrel. No import mark.