-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
09-11-2010 09:57 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
40,000 was max, high-pressure test ammo was between 45,000-50,000.
Scott
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
The design operating max pressure was 40,000 CPU (Copper Pressure Units) which is not the exact thing as PSI. Current SAAMI standards reflect that same amount. However for wildcating, you may want to do a little research. I believe I read somewhere that there was some general (public) experimenting on the .30 carbine platform in the 60's with several safe wildcats produced. It may save you some trouble or help you get some ideas of your safe options.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
The M18 high pressure test cartridge for the M1 carbine produced a chamber pressure of 47500 psi (TM 43-0001-27 - Army Ammunition Data Sheets). I don't think it was proofed from the shoulder.
Last edited by CrossedCannons; 09-12-2010 at 02:54 PM.
-
Legacy Member
The .30 carbine standard operating pressure is 40,000 PSI. The standard for the .357 Mag. is 35,000 PSI. As to a wildcat cartridge conversion,many have been done over the years and most have failed quite badly. The really successful ones have been base on the .30 carbine case necked down to .22. One man even marketed a .45 magnum version a while ago but it started to destroy the carbine as too much metal was removed from the receivers and needless to say he is no longer in business. The biggest limiting factor to a conversion is the magazine and getting it to feed properly with anything other then the .30 carbine case.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
FWIW:
Port pressure and gas port size would be another significant issue with any wildcat conversion involving the M1 Carbine platform.
-
Advisory Panel
(Deceased Feb 2023)
I don't think it was proofed from the shoulder.
You are correct. All proof firing was done in a separate area to prevent injury if something failed. The below pictures show proof firing of an assembled carbine (left) and a carbine bolt and barrel (right). The firing was done remotely.
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Bill Ricca For This Useful Post:
-
firstflabn
Guest
Nice pic, Bill. Several years ago a History Channel program - perhaps the US episode of the three part 'Guns of WWII' - included film of the proof firing of completed carbines. A gal was squeezing off a quick 15 in the apparatus shown on the left in your photo. Following the proof firing film clip they showed a gang apparatus for cycling slides on assembled carbines. Seems like about seven guns in a circular setup. I will see if I can find the episdoe and the time it appears on the DVD.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Mr Ricca, thanks for the info, were catastrophic failures during carbine proof testing ever actually documented? And if so, how frequently? Or was the apparatus designed, built and used just as a precaution?
-
Advisory Panel
(Deceased Feb 2023)
I am not sure of the procedure shown on the history channel, but proof firing, which is high pressure test cartridges, was not done with multiple rounds, or by hand. I am sure the history channel got the procedures mixed up. One proof round was all that was used, as a firearm could not consistently adhere to the high pressure.
There were devices to test fire with permanent holding due to lack of impact area, like an underground dirt tunnel.
If you notice the text states "safety precautions".
I know of no records of how many firearms failed, but I can tell you talking to an employee at Springfield Armory, it did happen (Garand, M14 and 30 BMG) when they were handling thousands of barrels, bolts and firearms.
Don't know if they kept track of the overall percentage, I doubt it.
-
Thank You to Bill Ricca For This Useful Post: