L39A1 at auction recently

[paulseamus]

There's even LESS available now as another 26 have recently been guilloutined

No.

Who would commit such a dastardly act?

Peter, please explain.

Paul

[harry mac]

Marking the rifle number on the top of the butt as in this case wouldn't make any sense at all because our armoury racks line the rifles up with the top of the rifles against the wall and then they're chained in along, through the trigger guards.

It could have been asked for by the Oi/c shooting team to show that the rifles had the correct butt stock fitted. I once had my SLR returned from a trip to the armourer's shop with a different (shorter) butt installed, so switches can happen.

[Thunderbox]

Marking the rifle number on the top of the butt as in this case wouldn't make any sense at all because our armoury racks line the rifles up with the top of the rifles against the wall and then they're chained in along, through the trigger guards.

If it was with a unit any time after about 1987 then it would have been shoved horizontally in a rack designed for SA80 - which would be a good reason to have the number in a visible location on the top of the butt.

Another possibility is that if the rifle has a target rail fitted, then it would have been used on a firing point with a a small target bipod/stand fitted. Schools and units with a number of identical rifles do tend to paint or stamp identifying marks on them to differentiate the rifles on the firing point.

[spinecracker]

It's a funny old world - I met the new owner of this L39A1 yesterday at the Big Reno Show - he had the rifle with him (not for sale, though) and I recognized it because of the mark in the right side of the forend near the magazine well. He has been collecting Lee Enfields for decades and was a jolly nice bloke. He did have a 1955 UF series No.4 Mk.2 in the wrap for sale, but I couldn't afford the $1100 he was asking (makes me want to sell mine for a thousand lol).