+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Need an opinion on the last one..

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel Simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    02-22-2023 @ 07:49 AM
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    585
    Real Name
    SIMON
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:14 AM
    Top ones built on a Ross action

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:14 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:14 AM
    ooooops, sorry. Been looking at too much Sovieticon stuff in the past few years!

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    Legacy Member Maple_Leaf_Eh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 10:41 PM
    Posts
    255
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    06:14 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderbox View Post
    I think it might be real, but of Indian manufacture/conversion in 1960s.
    If you look closely at the No.5 forestock, you may see a tiny shiney spot. Is this an Ishapore Screw?

    However, more to the storyline, I would seriously question the "relic of Arnheim" provenance. Yes the Paras and Glider troops were uniquely equipped, but there are limits to their eccentricities. One former SF supporter I know will tell you that the special forces are more disciplined than casual observers might think. No room for cowboys or free-runners, despite whatever public persona they might try to cultivate. When something happens, it is for a clear and defensible reason.

  6. #14
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:14 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:14 AM
    Hey Maple Leaf. Don't be toooo harsh..... Maybe there's a tribal village called Arnhem near Ishapore!

    But back to the 4" bomb thrower. On the Stokes conversions we had, they had a large diameter threaded section of barrel just behind the bomb cup thinggy with a lock-nut and star washer to lock the lock-nut. This would in effect lock the breech and cup to the bracket on the turret or hull of the tank. I can't see this on the top rifle so am bound to ask how the xxxx it was held against the turret. Definately not by hand as the recoil would be quite, er........., ferocious to put it mildly! I can imagine the flowery language the tank commander might be using to the gunner/bombardier should he accidently discharge that 4" bomb in or anywhere near to the tank while it's not fastened down securely.

    Maybe we could have a competition to find the most fitting words.......

  7. #15
    Legacy Member gsimmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,368
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:14 AM
    We're not supposed to use that kind of language, Peter.



  8. #16
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    03-27-2024 @ 03:29 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    77
    Posts
    963
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    06:14 AM
    Warren I have handled a few grenade launching variants out of India, much like the one you show. Based on an Indian Ordnance magazine published late '44 or early '45 (memory?) India was very serious about developing a spigot grenade launcher in late WWII. Britainicon had gone to the 2inch mortar and phased out the grenade cups and spigots. They returned to the spigot post war with launchers for No.5/No.4 and the SLR. India developed a sheet metal rear sight that fit the stock band and folded up to give a sighting grid like the mecar launchers. I have a No.1 MkV set up this way. I can't tell from the photo if the handguard band has a hole in it for the folding sight. Any way I would not say no but would like to examine it first hand. One thing I did note was Indian spigots seem to have different rib widths and spacing. The other two appear to be right as well. I have the top shown cup from Springfield Sporters. They came in from Indian tanks with a stamped steel martini action. BATF made them destroy the martinis as they were considered destructive devices. Best, p.

  9. #17
    Legacy Member gsimmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,368
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:14 AM

  10. Thank You to gsimmons For This Useful Post:


  11. #18
    Deceased January 15th, 2016 Beerhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    01-02-2016 @ 04:03 PM
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    1,181
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    10:14 AM
    Attachment 46883
    This is what the barrel extension looked like when it was still in one piece. Note the sight.

    Please excuse the spelling on the label.

  12. #19
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:14 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:14 AM
    We had to return all the No4 grenade launchers like the one shown above to Ordnance when the L1A1 rifle version came on stream. But the leather pouch part was retained for the L1A1 launcher. That's presumably the reason that the No4 launchers are quite common but the pouches are hard to find. There were zillions of the old redundant No4 type launchers in the Armourers shops and QM's for years as nobody ever seemed to return stuff! After all, if they were going to dispose of it, we might as well do it locally! I seem to remember that there were two types of launcher for the No4 and we could only get the spare folding sight part for one type.

    In Malaya we had a No5 type......... What a complicated contraption it was. Double jointed clamp and....... and....... No tanks there and very little armour!

  13. #20
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 05:37 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,409
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:14 AM
    The top two I have no trouble with. Several early [1939] tanks had these on the outside for smoke discharge, as seen here on this Light Tank Mk.VIB in the desert.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. opinion on my 5.58 HRA
    By Curt in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-23-2009, 05:37 PM
  2. Opinion
    By imarangemaster in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-20-2009, 07:04 PM
  3. Professional opinion
    By Randy A in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-10-2009, 12:20 PM
  4. I would like everyones opinion.
    By PBI in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-18-2009, 03:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts