+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Your considered opinion please - 5-43 Inland M1

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Maple_Leaf_Eh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 10:41 PM
    Posts
    255
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:49 AM

    Your considered opinion please - 5-43 Inland M1

    I recently bought a 5-43 dated Inland, sn 265xxx. I have the reference books for many types of WWII firearm to recognize the differences, but nothing on the US M1icon Carbine. So, I'd like a little coaching on what this little rifle tells us. Using the carbine club download sheet, I will run through the obvious parts' identification.

    Flat topped bolt, marked IO and 2 on the left lug, rounded profile right lug
    Early joint op rod, 3/16" step, flat bottom, V-top cam cut
    M1 trigger group, marked INLAND, no hole on the left side
    Smooth push button safety
    Smooth magazine release, marked ESG
    Hammer marked IH
    Trigger marked RI
    Type 1 barrel band, marked U, with stamped sling loop
    Milled front sight, slope style, marked IS
    Barrel is marked INLAND MFG DIV, GENERAL MOTORS, 5-43. Also marked with a big 5 on the swell in front of the breech ring
    Receiver marked with maker and serial number almost concealed under back sight
    Stamped slider rear sight, marked H in shield
    Recoil plate, marked AU
    Square pattern checkered butt plate (the dust and fluff underneath are worth leaving behind as a curiousity!)
    Stock marked IO in sling cut, rounded end oiler slot, high wood

    The carbine looks 'old' with well matching wear on the parts. The last four digits of the serial number are repeated on the top of the bolt, in the sling slot, on the slide arm and on the trigger itself. Except for the stamped sight and these extra numbers, I judge this carbine is close to original condition with many early style parts. What does the collective wisdom think?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Moderator
    (Deceased Nov 16th, 2019)

    JimF4M1s (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-14-2023 @ 10:08 PM
    Location
    USA
    Age
    74
    Posts
    3,439
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    08:49 AM
    Maple_Leaf_Eh ,

    Some markings do not ring true for the low SN. The rear sight should be a leaf not adj. The E-SG mag release usually is found on a Saginaw Gear. AU recoil plates are found on Underwoods. Having the serial number on other parts. I cut to O cut sling wells started early summer 1943. Things like that.

    Pictures would be a better help.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Maple_Leaf_Eh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 10:41 PM
    Posts
    255
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:49 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by JimF4M1sicon View Post
    Maple_Leaf_Eh ,

    Some markings do not ring true for the low SN. The rear sight should be a leaf not adj. The E-SG mag release usually is found on a Saginaw Gear. AU recoil plates are found on Underwoods. Having the serial number on other parts. I cut to O cut sling wells started early summer 1943. Things like that.

    Pictures would be a better help.
    Jim:

    I agree with your points. The stamped sight is usually considered a post-war revision. To be authentic (to type) the backsight should be a flip. Without splitting hairs, the common opinion for many wartime items, whether No.4 Lee Enfields or Garands, subcontractors traded parts to fill contracts. To expect the whole production line to take a break while one little shop made more whatevers. No, things got moving to meet requirements. This is why I don't sweat the RI, ESG and U marked parts. The stock could be a very early adoption or an in-service replacement. It could even have come off an Underwood carbine.

    Terry

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Maple_Leaf_Eh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 10:41 PM
    Posts
    255
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:49 AM
    Thread Starter
    These are the photos off the internet auction.









  7. #5
    Legacy Member imarangemaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-19-2023 @ 12:24 AM
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,308
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    10:49 AM
    Nice Carbine with honest wear. I wouldn't mess with it. I am partial carbines with adjustable sight, but no bayonet lug. My transitional 5.7 mil Winchester has original stamped rear sight and type II band. Since yours still has the type I band, it may not be a post war rebuild (where everything was generally upgraded), but may have been upgraded with the adjustable sight late war in theater. IIRC, some carbines had adjustable sights put on in early 45 by division armorers if they went back for repair.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member kar66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    03-10-2024 @ 07:22 PM
    Location
    California, Mo.
    Posts
    141
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    10:49 AM

    Wink Inland?

    With the numbered bolt and slide I would think it was one of the Germanicon returns. The Germans always numbered parts. A lot of them came back with type 1 bands and only a few postwar up grades. I saw 2 at a show a month ago. Both had type 1 bands and 1 still had the flip rear sight. I usually don't check them to close as the numbered parts turn me off. I'm sure others will add more.

  9. #7
    Legacy Member INLAND44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-23-2022 @ 07:42 PM
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,134
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:49 AM
    Yes, it's a 'Bavarian'.

  10. #8
    Legacy Member Maple_Leaf_Eh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 10:41 PM
    Posts
    255
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    11:49 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks fellas. I was confused by the numbered parts, but the adjustable sight and apparently early parts. Thanks for the help!

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Need an opinion on the last one..
    By Warren in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-08-2013, 10:05 AM
  2. Gunbroker auction. Considered and decided to ask a question about this one.
    By newcastle in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-22-2012, 05:04 AM
  3. Is it considered "tacky"?
    By EnfCol in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-15-2011, 05:20 PM
  4. PH5B sight ever considered military issue for the P14
    By 174-FMJ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-10-2011, 02:19 AM
  5. opinion on my 5.58 HRA
    By Curt in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-23-2009, 05:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts