-
Legacy Member
Returning a rifle to how it came from the factory is in fact a BUBBA job. The military repaired , upgraded rifles all the way until they were sold out of service. The original rifle may have had a mix of manufacturers parts or hand fitted parts. You just don't know. Don't assume.
-
-
04-07-2019 06:52 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Originally Posted by
Bindi2
Returning a rifle to how it came from the factory is in fact a BUBBA job. The military repaired , upgraded rifles all the way until they were sold out of service. The original rifle may have had a mix of manufacturers parts or hand fitted parts. You just don't know. Don't assume.
It's almost as if I am trying to figure out the history of the handguards and what might have happened to the rifle by being here....
---------- Post added at 07:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:07 AM ----------
That's a very good point - frequently meat was removed from the underside of hand guards to ensure they did not foul a heavier profile barrel. This often led to the removal of the bottom of the rivet, leaving only friction holding it in place. A gob of plastic wood may have seemed a solution. It may not be the case here, but worth checking before you dig out the filler!
Outside of the filled rivets the rest seems to be in order and standard.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
Wigglesabum
the rest seems to be in order and standard.
Then they were filled by someone outside the military that didn't like the look.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Then they were filled by someone outside the military that didn't like the look.
Understood. I will revert it back to its original military design. I have been searching photos trying to find any handguards with them filled but no luck yet.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
An additional note as well, the front hand guard is stamped with a "F" and the rear is a "TS" and a feint broad arrow.