-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Why are Long Branches so desirable?
Hi guys, great forum. I've learned heaps that will come in handy when I get my Savage No4 Mk1* from the local gunshop (still waiting on my permit to come back!), and hopefully when I start collecting LE's down the track.
One thing I really would like to know is why are Long Branch rifles worth more than your average LE? I've read Reynold's book and done some searching on here and I still haven't found a definitive answer for this question.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
09-07-2009 03:17 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Personally I see no reason for a premium on any particular manufacturer (unless its a small run item). I think there is probably a tendency for 'locals' to want what was manufactured locally - ie Aussies favour Lithgows, Americans favour Savage etc.
Our resident Enfield expert and author Peter Laidler
commented on the old Jouster
forum :
"Another problem they encountered was that with the speed of wartime production, the induction hardening of the bodies was at best, mediocre, and at worst, sometimes virtually non existant. The hardening sometimes had no depth and it was tested at Base Workshops by the old IZOD impact test method. Apparently, all manufacturers were as bad or good as each other including Savage and LB (I bet that has shocked a few of you who were probably lead to believe that some makers were 'better' than others......) "
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
-
Deceased January 15th, 2016
Not in the UK
they aren't. People like me, at school came across many broken bolt-head tracks and so that put us off the North American Mk1*s, preferring those No4s with a catch. We tend to pass that on and so in my experience people this side of the pond don't go for Mk1*s.
However, as has already been said, collectors (of anything, not just firearms) do seem to like their own county's production.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thanks for your responses. I agree with the 'local' rifle being the desired one, I myself was aiming for a Lithgow
when I went to the gun store two weeks ago, but the Savage No 4 I've bought just felt more substantial and higher quality than the Lithgow's he had available at the time. I plan on getting a Lithgow eventually, as parts of these were produced in my home town (Dubbo). A bit off the topic of LB's, but does anyone know what exactly was produced in Dubbo for the Lithgow SMLE??
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
XLesky, Although quality from all of the No.4 manufacturers is very much the same, everybody has their own favorite manufacturer based on their own experiances.
Beerhunter, Chipping of the bolt rail can usually nailed down to the bolthead used. At some point early in Mk.I* production, and so far undocumented, Long Branch and Savage began to chamfer the leading and trailing edges of the bolthead's rail slot. Mk.1/3 owners who've had a problem of the bolthead jumping out of track have fixed the problem by chamfering.
On the left is a '55 Fazakerley, the right is a '51 Long Branch.

Brad
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Granted that I may have a North American bias, I prefer Longbranch #4's and Lithgow
#1's. The #4 LB's because mine seem to have tighter bores (and shoot better for me) than my British
rifles and the #1 Lithgows because I like the A inside the sun symbol and I love the smell of coachwood.
The #4 bias may simply be because the British rifles I have are more worn. I will agree that the Mk1 bolt head release is more substantial than the slot on Mk1* rifles. I have yet to own a Mk1* that had a significant problem with the slot though, so my inexperience may be concealing the significance of the difference between Mk1 and Mk1* rifles.
Last edited by scout7; 09-07-2009 at 10:34 AM.
Reason: added bolt head release comments
-
Banned
-
Actually, of all the makers of No.4's, my favorite is the early Maltby rifles with the "ROFM" stamped on the receiver side wall. Why, because you simply don't find many of them
-
Thank You to Amatikulu For This Useful Post:
-
Banned
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Wasn't the original green gun tape???