-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
1950 Enfield #1 Mk4
I am wondering what is the correct bayonet I should be looking for, for my LE #4 Mk1 dated 1950? Is it the same ones from WWII? Or were changes made after the war?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
07-10-2007 11:57 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
you could also turn to the no7[although not specific to the no4 rifle] or the no9 with its blade that looks like a no5 bayo , thats if you wanted to depart from the spikes
Last edited by A square 10; 08-27-2007 at 06:49 PM.
Reason: added photo
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Canada
only produced the No.4 MKII, so yes its the same. Rumours that a small number of No.7 and No.9 were purchased from England
, but in 36 years of collecting I have never seen either one with Canadian Property Markings.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
gotta agree there , if you want an LB marked bayo the mkII would be the one [i too have only seen this one]but they were issued with whatever - no attempt to match anything so he could go with what he likes/finds at a decent price
-
A 1950 would ideally be best complimented by a Canadian
Arsenals "CA" marked No.4MkII spike bayonet, but they are tough to find. a LB proofed one would work just as well.
Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!
-
-
Legacy Member
Are these the same spike bayonets that ,i've heard, have a lot of fakes floating around?.
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
WW2GURU
Are these the same spike bayonets that ,i've heard, have a lot of fakes floating around?.
The only ones that are usually faked are the no4mk1 bayonet, which was the cruciform bayonet.
By milling a few grooves down the length of the blade, you turn a $3 bayonet into a $125 bayonet.
Things ot watch for on the cruciform is that it should be a Singer, and I believe there is a slight difference in the overall length.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
fake can aften be noted by the flutes as well , in how they are cut , the shape of the turnout and tip , the mkI as noted were only made by singer and with only 75000 made in early to mid 1941 , they would be the least likely to have been mated to your `1950' LB and also as stated with the mkII being the only one made outside britan [ie; canada & us] it would be best suited