-
Legacy Member
No4Mk1T BSA 1944?
Hi Everyone, I bought a BSA No.4 Mk1T 1944 in 2009 and I'm hoping someone can tell me about it if possible. I see the 1944 serial numbers do not list a letter D prefix . My serial # is D36701. Gun pictures are on the way just as soon as I can figure out how to send them. This Site really has a ton of information on it ! Toledo Bob
My inquiry is about the serial number on my No4Mk1T BSA 1944. Mine is D36701 and in the Article by Graeme"broadarrow 303" Barber ---From No4 Mk I (T) to L42A1 - Part 1 no mention is made of a "D" prefix. Only A, C, F, H, K, L, M, P, Q, R Will send more pictures if needed. thanks, Toledo Bob
Gun pictures are on the way just as soon as I can figure out how to send them. This Site really has a ton of information on it ! Toledo Bob
My inquiry is about the serial number on my No4Mk1T BSA 1944. Mine is D36701 and in the Article by Graeme"broadarrow 303" Barber ---From No4 Mk I (T) to L42A1 - Part 1 no mention is made of a "D" prefix. Only A, C, F, H, K, L, M, P, Q, R Will send more pictures if needed. thanks, Toledo Bob
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
Last edited by Badger; 08-09-2011 at 05:40 PM.
Reason: Merged and edited multiple posts for member into single post and moved to Lee Enfield Forum ...
-
Thank You to Toledobob For This Useful Post:
-
08-08-2011 07:29 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
D serial number prefixes certainly did exist................ Question answered.
Might I respectfully suggest that you clean off the varnish. Totally un-original varnished fore-ends, rain or damp and sniping aren't things that seem to go well together somehow.
-
-
-
No scope? Or did I just miss it?
Varnish or too much boiled linseed oil
? One's easier to rectify than the other. Regardless, NO sandpaper!
Have you shot it?
-
-
Legacy Member
I thank you both for the quick reply. I was excited to see the replies. Peter- I have a couple of your books. jmoore- thanks for the rectify info. I do shoot it w/lead bullets, VG, a No32MkI, NM, and a re-po scope mount. Thanks again! Toledo Bob
-
-
Advisory Panel
As you probably know, the forend has been replaced at some point. What you have is MkI beech, circa 1941/42, not the usual walnut. Perhaps sporterized at one point and then restored?
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:
-
You've puzzled me Surpmill.......... If it's a 1944 rifle, why wouldn't it have a post 1941(?) beech fore-end that has the low right side mag cut off recess?
-
-
Advisory Panel
You've puzzled me Surpmill.......... If it's a 1944 rifle, why wouldn't it have a post 1941(?) beech fore-end that has the low right side mag cut off recess?
Apart from the fact that the forend has an old Fazakerley rifle number on it, I thought that all wartime BSA rifles - and especially those selected to be Ts - were built with walnut forends?
AFAIK, only Fazakerley started using beech during WW2, Maltby and BSA appear to have continued with walnut.
-
Thank You to Thunderbox For This Useful Post:
-
Early Maltbys seem to have some beech furniture, but they don't turn up often.
As far as a 1944 BSA No.4 Mk.I(T)? Beech would be a surprise. Low wood seems right out.
The rifle is also no longer blued, it seems, on this wretched monitor. Either suncorite or plain ol' black paint. So, some degree of rework has been done. If it's proper "in service" rebuild work, I don't see a problem with either a suncorite finish or a rwplacement fore stock. But, it's hard for me to tell what's what, Need input from those that can "see" better. May check back in over the weekend in a better machine for closer inspection, I'm relying on y'all for detail observations right mow!
Last edited by jmoore; 08-11-2011 at 05:19 AM.
-
-
Yep, got that. It's a question of the Faz Beech and not the age of the fore-end! But as mentioned in another thread, when it went out of the Armourers shop, it went out with a closest match to what was on the shelf!
-
-
Legacy Member
Does the "Trigger" look original? If not, what would be the reason for changing it?
-