-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Looking for definitive/detailed information on New Zealand 03's
I have come across a minty 03, early 42 production Remington that appears to be all original, with a NZ
stock, but the stock lacks any other markings.
Anyone know of where I can get a book, or internet help to find exact/detailed/correct information on these rifles
Thanks
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
04-19-2012 09:54 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
John Beard
once told me the first 30,000 Remington M1903s were sent to NZ
. The rifles were stamped on the butt stock with a NZ, a broad arrow & a 4-digit number. They were not issued & returned after the war.
-
-
They do not have the red band seen on British
M1903s. They are usually completely correct/original.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
--George Orwell
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I am far from schooled on these, but this thing is minty, as new.
Almost appears to be unfired, all parts are marked R with some blued, some parked.
The only mark on the stock is the NZ
and arrow.
No "P" or other inspector marks.
The serial indicates late Jan/early Feb 42.
I am happy with it, just curious why the stock lacks any other cartouches.
Would this be normal?
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
thumper ...

Originally Posted by
thumper
I am far from schooled on these, but this thing is minty, as new.
Almost appears to be unfired, all parts are marked R with some blued, some parked.
The only mark on the stock is the
NZ
and arrow.
No "P" or other inspector marks.
The serial indicates late Jan/early Feb 42.
I am happy with it, just curious why the stock lacks any other cartouches.
Would this be normal?
It's not probable that all the 'Original' Remington stock stampings and Cartouches were sanded off so as to be invisable. That being said if your stock lacks evidence of them but does have the N^Z stamp then your stock likely was a replacement stock which was installed/stamped in NZ; usually followed with a stamped #. US Rifles sent to NZ also had spare parts sent for necessary repairs which obviously would have included replacement stocks.
It'd be helpfull to know your rifle serial # and if your stock is a 'grasping groove' or smooth???
To my knowledge there is no known serial # list of Remington 1903's that were sent to NZ. It does appear to me that it was not any sequential grouping of serial #'s.
HTH..Mike Haas
Last edited by Mike Haas; 04-20-2012 at 09:30 PM.
-
Legacy Member
-
Thank You to sakorick For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thanks
I have sent photos to Mike Haas and waiting for his reply.
After that, I may try to contact John Beard
.
Thanks again
Bob
-
Legacy Member
John B. is the right guy for this discussion.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
thumper (Bob)

Originally Posted by
thumper
Thanks
I have sent photos to Mike Haas and waiting for his reply.
After that, I may try to contact John
Beard
.
Thanks again
Bob
Sakorick (Rick) 's post essentially mirrors my opinion. I did recieve your excellant photos. I've responded to you asking you to send some additional photos of specific areas on your stock. At this point with the photos I have in hand of your stock I still think it's a "Field Replacement" stock. I absolutely believe your R/S N^Z stamp is entirely legit and I must add further that the 10629 number following the N^Z stamp is the highest # I have yet seen.
John Beard is a much better "Go-To" guy than I on this. Hopefully he'll chime in. Meanwhile I'm waiting for your second batch of pictures..
..Mike Haas
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Mike they are on the way to you, will do them right away
Thanks again Bob