-
Legacy Member
No 1 Mk VI
Any thoughts on the No 1 Mk VI that is being seen on one of the auctions sites? Looks like a clean one to me. Priced at almost 3K. No takers last time I saw.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
07-19-2012 09:31 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
they did not show details of the rear sight or the plunger (at least when I looked). I thought for that kind of cash there should have been a lot more pictures of the critical features.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Critical to that kind of value that the original rear sight is there, its internally different than the common No4 that looks the same as.
-
Contributing Member
Isn't that a Line Throwing "LT" butt stock on it?
-
-
Legacy Member
yes it is. that was another mystery, as the front sight was there, along with an early sight protector.
Forend wood has the early grip cuts as well.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
limpetmine
Any thoughts on the No 1 Mk VI that is being seen on one of the auctions sites? Looks like a clean one to me. Priced at almost 3K. No takers last time I saw.
Sold for $3,570 (inc shipping). The lack of pictures and "LT" on the buttstock kept me away from it. Might be a good pickup for somebody, but I'm not much of a risk taker any more.
-
-
Legacy Member
Last edited by Charlie; 07-20-2012 at 03:54 PM.
-
-
Well it's hard to judge when there's no link! Where was it?
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
jmoore
Well it's hard to judge when there's no link! Where was it?
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=296059824
-
Thank You to tlvaughn For This Useful Post:
-
Ach, zo. Auction was over before I read the thread the first time.
Cocking piece is suspect. Willing to guess the front soght protector is a "SM'41".
Don't like the renumbering at all.
I believe y'alls' instincts were right. Looks nice from a distance, but scary money for a project.
Thanks for the reference! It might turn up again. "Improved"
-
Thank You to jmoore For This Useful Post: