-
Legacy Member
-
-
11-30-2006 06:36 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
I'm shocked you guys don't find this find interesting enough to comment on.
Same with CGN
No comments what so ever.
Must be milsurp fatigue.
-
-
-
Advisory Panel
It IS an interesting rifle, would seem to have been assembled specifically for the RHKDF. Wonder where it was set up. I could see rifles being assembled for a special order from available parts. Have never heard of another one. There was a batch of ex-RHKPF Colt .38 S&W revolvers sold surplus a while back. Wonder if this was released at the same time.
-
-
Looks like a post-war commercial rifle bade from leftover No.4 and No.5 parts. The Foreign Office sometimes contracted, always with BSA as they were a private concern, to supply rifles to the colonials. Hong Kong qualified for such an arrangement 
It's an interesting and rare Enfield with limited appeal to all but the most devoted collectors as it's a commercial, post-war variant that probably never saw action and a purist would say the post-war commercial put-togethers are less desireable, much like commercial Long Lees are often collected less than the military issue versions.
I find it interesting, but alot of milsurp guys wouldn't.
Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!
-
-
Legacy Member
I dissagree
I think a find like this is:
HIGHLY Desireable
HIGHLY Collectible
Especially if you're Chinese
It represents a period of Chinese / British
History that is rarely available to anyone let alone avid collectors.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Are there any reports of rifles such as these being ordered? For example, there were a variety of contracts for No. 4 Mk.2 rifles in the post war period. In a way its odd that a rifle such as this was set up, because there was a vast supply of standard rifles available in the period. Perhaps it was assembled in HK from available parts.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed