-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
New ammo dac help
Hi could anyone help me with info on this ammo, the brass is in excellent shape can it be reloaded. And is it corrosive. Thanks.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
03-11-2013 05:08 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Hi
DAC Dominion Arsenal, CANADA
1944 so i would say corrosive sure someone will tell you if i am wrong, as for reloading it looks to be Berdan primed would think finding the right sized primers would be a hard task
Last edited by boristhepig; 03-11-2013 at 06:15 PM.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I believe all Canadian
WWII small arms ammo production was non-corrosive Boxer primed. Pull one and check for the number/style of flash holes.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Canadian
cartridges, but is that boz Canadian ISAA?
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
RCEMERalf
Canadian
cartridges, but is that boz Canadian ISAA?
What do you mean by boz it just has DAC with the arrow please explain. thanks
---------- Post added at 08:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:36 PM ----------

Originally Posted by
jonnyc
I believe all Canadian WWII small arms ammo production was non-corrosive Boxer primed. Pull one and check for the number/style of flash holes.
I have a puller but where are the flash holes are you talking about the primer hole. forgive my ignorance. thanks
---------- Post added at 08:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:39 PM ----------

Originally Posted by
jonnyc
I believe all Canadian WWII small arms ammo production was non-corrosive Boxer primed. Pull one and check for the number/style of flash holes.
It just came to me are you talking about the number of flash holes in the primer itself. not to bright today. thanks
-
Legacy Member
DAC: Canadian
, probably.
The primers appear to have brass cups. This would indicate that they are NOT mercuric. Commonwealth stuff with the 0.250" diameter COPPER primer cups is ALWAYS a Mercury-based primer. Mercury corrupts brass by interfering with the alloying between the copper and zinc. It has pretty much nil effect on copper on its own.
If the primer cups are 1/4" diameter, they will be Berdan style. These can sometimes be found in better gunshops. RWS 6000 is the Berdan style primer used to reload such cases. If the primers are 0.217" diameter and Berdan style, then you can use the RWS 5627, of, if you can find a stash, the RWS 5608, which is an unplated brass "MILSPEC" cup of heavier construction.
If the primers are 0.210" diameter and boxer style with the anvil in the primer cup, you are in luck, as that is a "standard" Large Rifle primer used around most of the world. Remington 9 1/2 is a classic of the breed, though just about everyone, including the Russians, makes a suitable primer.
Such primers are NON mercuric, thus the brass is less likely to become brittle after the first firing. Being "military" brass, it will probably be a little harder and thicker than "sporting" cases. See your loading manual and consult serious reloading types for more details.
Quick way to tell if it's boxer or Berdan: shine a light into the case. If there is only a central hole in the base, it will be boxer; well done. If you can just make out two tiny holes offset from the centre, it is Berdan.
There is one exception to this, as usual. There was a swag of Portuguese .303 ammo that turned up over twenty years ago. It had a large diameter BRASS cupped primer. However it had a very large anvil formed in the primer pocket. This anvil had a very small central flash-hole and a transverse slot formed in it. The final odd thing was that the primer was not the "Brit. standard" 0.250" diameter, but similar to the Russian
7.62 x 54 primer diameter of 0.254". Interestingly, 0.254" primers, like the Eley No 172 or the RWS 1775 were extensively used in British
and German
"Express" cartridges, like the .416 Rigby and the 9.3 x 72.
I think that's enough ammo trivia for the day.
Last edited by Bruce_in_Oz; 03-11-2013 at 09:07 PM.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
jonnyc
I believe all
Canadian
WWII small arms ammo production was non-corrosive Boxer primed.
I believe that that is not the case.....
Note headstamp, date, and presence of anvil.
Ergo, Canadian made, during ww2, Berdan primed.
Last edited by Maxwell Smart; 03-11-2013 at 10:07 PM.
-
Thank You to Maxwell Smart For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Ok, I wasn't sure about the .303, that's definitely Berdan.
I am pretty sure, however, that you will find that Canadian
wartime 7.92 and 9mm are both non-corrosive Boxer.
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
jonnyc
Ok, I wasn't sure about the .303, that's definitely Berdan.
I am pretty sure, however, that you will find that
Canadian
wartime 7.92 and 9mm are both non-corrosive Boxer.
Fair enough.
The DAC .303 though is likely Berdan primed and corrosive. It is good brass and quite reloadable, IF you can get the primers...
Pulling a bullet to check the number of flash holes is a pain in a cordite loaded cartridge, in that you have to get the cordite strands out to see the flash holes - it is the very devil to get all 47-odd strands back IN again!
-