-
Legacy Member
41 winchester
I picked up a Winchester 137810 I am no expert but I think except for the but stock that is a springfield with a SA open box stamp and one of the rear sight knobs the rest of it is correct for a 41 Winchester bolt D28287-1 WRA, op rod uncut D35382RA, gar cylinder D25449wra, receiver leg 028291-2wra, trigger C46008-1wra, trigger guard C46025wra, trigger assembly D28290-wra.t guide B8875wra
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to rice 123 For This Useful Post:
-
07-18-2015 11:54 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
To say the least, there's some nice early parts there. Low number, just the way I like them. With the parts mentioned, are you thinking it's a "Corrected " rifle?
-
-
-
Legacy Member
I do not think it was corrected fit and finish is very consistent. It came out of an old collectors estate he had a lot of early stuff. I read in one of the books that the but stock and rear sight were mandatory upgrades. Even if I did find a no trap stock and but plate I doubt if I could ever afford to buy it
-
Thank You to rice 123 For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Might be worth a try here though...there IS such around...? Nice rifle anywayzzz, very nice.
-
-
Legacy Member
1941 Winchester
Attachment 64194
photo of my three digit still with the DuLite finish - the no trap stocks went into early/mid 1942 with the production. I would think your rifle may have had some restoration at some
period
-
-
Contributing Member
Early WRA
Nice rifle. The Fall GCA
Journal will have a detailed comparison of two that are almost as early: 146219 and 163103. Both are totally original and minty.
Real men measure once and cut.
-
-
Legacy Member
yes it could have had some restoration at some point but the last owner is dead and there is no one to ask . Also everything seems to be correct but the stock and rear sight and they were were a mandatory upgrade seems like if someone was restoring it they would have replaced those items also
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
rice 123
I do not think it was corrected

Originally Posted by
rice 123
yes it could have had some restoration
Bit of two minds now...?
-
-
-
-
Advisory Panel
Second pic didn't come out Rick...
-