-
USS Fitzgerald
The guided-missile destroyer USS Fitzgerald in a collision with a Philippine-flagged container ship.
Damage was on the Starboard side. She could have foundered, or even sunk, but for the crew's desperate efforts to save the ship.
Maritime rules suggest vessels are supposed to give way to ships on their starboard.
USS Fitzgerald 8,315-ton vs. Container Ship 29,000 tons carrying 1,080 containers.
7 souls lost, RIP.
How could this happen?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to painter777 For This Useful Post:
-
06-18-2017 04:48 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Many factors could be at play. Some which I have heard suggested (not definitive, but possibilities) are having the tracking signature turned off, the fact that this ships signature would turn up much smaller than it actually is due to concealment technology, inadequate training for the officer of the watch, etc.
Hopefully there will be lessons learned which will help prevent tragedies like this.
-
Thank You to Eaglelord17 For This Useful Post:
-
-
Broad sided in the middle of the night. Imagine the confusion and panic. How they kept her afloat is amazing. My Daughter served in the Navy. Through her I met so many, so young and spirited.
I really feel for the Families of those lost.
Just tragic.
CH-P777
-
Thank You to painter777 For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Call me a skeptic, my thoughts are it was somehow intentional. Maybe 'Lil Kim assumed control of the merchant ship? I had heard the merch was doing some oddball maneuvering ahead of the hit. Nothing would make the "midget idjit" happier than seeing the US with egg on it's face...
Russ
-
Thank You to RASelkirk For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
It does happen from time to time though, we had a couple do that over a few years too. One had a friend of mine working the engine room at the time of collision.
-
Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
As a former sailor, my best guess is that some OOD, along with the rest of the duty watch and the old man, are in deep dodo.
How a small, fast, destroyer type can be hit by a lumbering merchant vessel is inexplicable unless the whole bridge watch was badly distracted or asleep.
-
Contributing Member
I have to agree with Chainfire on this one. The destroyer may have been a small target for the container ship but the destroyer should have known exactly where that container ship was and been able to avoid it. All the advanced radar and tracking on that ship seems to have been for nothing.
-
Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
The careers that will surely be ended will not bring back those lost by a failure in leadership. The Captain was asleep but he assigns or approves of the watch schedule, same goes for the XO, the OOD is also toast. This is an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer with the Aegis Combat System, some form of negligence was present regardless who has the right-of-way, anything come within a 1,000 yards they should have taken that ship out of harm's way. God bless our Navy and all our armed forces, it's tough to lose good people when the means to detect and avoid are provided.
-
Thank You to Sarge1998 For This Useful Post:
-
-
-
Contributing Member
I read something to the effect that within Japanese
waters, US Navy vessels operate the same as civilian ships. Not sure I read that right, not sure what it means but it seems to imply that combat radar, etc might have been turned off and the ship on auto pilot. If this is Navy procedure, may not be the crew at fault but higher command.
-
Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post: