-
Contributing Member
What is Wrong With This Picture?
Seen today at the Reading WWII Weekend:
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
06-03-2018 06:30 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
I see two things: the flag arm band should not cover the rank and the private stripe should not be on the pocket cover
-
Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
The pony tail is ah a bit inauthentic. Mohawk yes PT no.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to HOOKED ON HISTORY For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
I have to admit the ponytail is what immediately caught my attention. What you can't see is the Beard
which while not long is rather heavy but still beyond what might be had in combat. The other things are a bit beyond my expertise but the flags don't look right and neither does some of the equipment they are wearing.
-
-
Contributing Member
-
Thank You to Ovidio For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
The flag arm band is backwards too. Believe there was a minimum height requirement too. And there's no division patch.
Spelling and Grammar count!
-
-
Legacy Member
Pee Wee PFC seems to be wearing black jump boots as well.
-
-
Contributing Member
Would be seen without your weapon if your wearing full kit?
-
-
Legacy Member
The 101st Abn Regiments used the playing card symbols on their helmets and they don't have the correct para chin straps.
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Skip
they don't have the correct para chin straps
The near ones do but the far one could just have his up over his head harness. I wore mine up inside most of the time as you don't require it unless standing in the door...and it's a pain when you're knocking around.
-
Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post: