-
Legacy Member
Vihtavuori powders.
I was on Amazon.com and found some Vihtavuori powders for sale. But they were listed as not made in Finland
like I thought. No they were listed as made in......China. Wonder if it's just some of the powders or are all of them now made there?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
07-06-2018 08:11 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
A friend bought one, expensive and overall not really appropriate for what he wanted to use his reloads in. Said the quality was excellent however he wasted his money for the cal/rifle he wanted to use it with.
I left him a message to call me as I would like to post what the issue was if he used it.
The N140 he bought is too slow burning to use in a gas piston system.
It worked well in his AR .223 as it is direct impingement. He did say accuracy with this powder was slightly improved.
Apparently N140 is too slow burning to use in a M14
/M1 Garand/M1a1 as it will pound the crap out of the piston. The powder pulse it too long and pounds the piston which in turn drives the action rod too hard and too fast.
He told me the Hornady reloading book recommends it as the best for accuracy. This issue had is not a reflection on the powder you just must buy the proper powder for what you are reloading.
Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?
-
-
-
Contributing Member
I use N140 for my Garand
in .308. Works well. With a 147 grs FMJBT I have good accuracy, good primers (no overpressure) and perfect cycling.
Normally I prefer Lovex S060-2 because it works as well and costs 40% less. But N140 is absolutely ok for me.
34a cp., btg. Susa, 3° rgt. Alpini
-
Thank You to Ovidio For This Useful Post:
-

Originally Posted by
Bruce McAskill
I was on Amazon.com and found some Vihtavuori powders for sale. But they were listed as not made in
Finland
like I thought. No they were listed as made in......China. Wonder if it's just some of the powders or are all of them now made there?
Read that Vihtavuori was now owned by Nammo, the parent co of Lapua.
Charlie-Painter777
A Country Has No Greater Responsibility Than To Care For Those Who Served...
-
-
-
Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:
-
-
-

Originally Posted by
Ovidio
Verschlimmbesserung
Can I take a guess ?
Tried to make better..........
But Failed to do so, making it Worse ?
Charlie-Painter777
A Country Has No Greater Responsibility Than To Care For Those Who Served...
-
-
Contributing Member
Yes. It is almost impossible to translate. I would dare a "downgrading upgrade".
34a cp., btg. Susa, 3° rgt. Alpini
-
Thank You to Ovidio For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Talked to my friend again about N140 and believe me he takes being anal in reloading to levels I wouldn't consider. It should not be used in the rifles I listed in post #2. I know many will disagree however he does research and development that boggles my mind. A once fired case to finished reload is 21 steps IIRC.
He told me after much research N140 will damage the OP rod and you probably won't notice till it is too late. Those rifles need a powder that burns at the same rate as H4895 or faster and N140 does not do that. ( I just called him and left a message as I think I remember what the powder is but not positive and will correct the XX when I hear back) N140's burn rate is too slow and this is evident from any burn rate chart. He is going to try N135 as he believes it may be OK.
When it comes to reloading I listen to people who are diligent in what they do as they have experienced the good, bad and ugly. I am going to the range today with a friend who is head and shoulders above most people in handgun cal. reloading. I listen to him as for years shot over 40,000 rounds of handgun all reloaded so knows what he is doing.
Last edited by enfield303t; 07-09-2018 at 10:11 PM.
Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to enfield303t For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
enfield303t
Talked to my friend again about N140 and believe me he takes being anal in reloading to levels I wouldn't consider. It should not be used in the rifles I listed in post #2. I know many will disagree however he does research and development that boggles my mind. A once fired case to finished reload is 21 steps IIRC.
I know one of those types. After a bore-scope investigation, he told me that my original Winchester 94 in 3240 was only fit for a display cabinet, not for shooting. But my WIN94 doesn't understand German
and therefore continues to shoot as well as I can point it (well OK, perhaps that's not so good any more).
So in which competitions does your friend participate, and how well does he place? I'm not being sarcastic, but there are some shooters who are so wrapped up in load fiddling, that they lose contact with actual shooting performance. I have a 6mm BR that will produce an 0.2 MOA group at 100 meters. Unfortunately, my PWF is larger than that. In other words, I am the limiting factor, and even if the rifle could produce 0.1MOA mounted on a lead sledge, that would hardly produce any visible improvement in my scores.
Twice as much time spent in practice under competition conditions would help me more than twice as many steps in producing "perfect" ammo. There is an old saying " a bad workman always blames his tools". Certainly, some spend more time optimizing their tools that actually learning to use them to best effect. OK, I'm old-fashioned.
Getting back to the 30-06 (or .308 for more modern types), I think it is not correct to conflate the Garand with its .308 successor, as the distance between the muzzle and the gas port on the Garand is much shorter than on the M1A
. So where the Garand op-rod receives a short "puff", the MIA gets a comparatively "slow blow". Still, I appreciate the warning and will seriously consider N135 - which, by the way, is the fastest powder in the Vihtavuori loading tables for 30-06 with 130gn or heavier bullets.
Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 07-09-2018 at 04:22 PM.
-