-
Legacy Member
My Ross MkII
Need some help in identifying my Ross. I did take it apart to look for a serial number. On the barrel it was stamped 83C and the receiver was stamped 57. It also had some rear sight screw holes on the bottom of the barrel. Here are some pictures. I will be getting more detailed pictures when I finishing cleaning it.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
02-22-2019 09:35 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
It appears to be a typical U.S. Issue 1905 Ross MkII 3*. This rifle appears to have been inspected at Rock Island Arsenal as identified by the markings in your first Pic. The U.S. Gov't procured somewhere around 20,000 of these rifles for training purposes. The Stock on yours has been sanded at some point, as all of the relevant factory markings on the right side of the butt are now gone. Also, the buttplate appears non original, and the nose cap looks to be from a P14, or M1917 Enfield. If it has a decent bore, it should make for a good shooter.
Last edited by M94/14; 02-24-2019 at 02:37 AM.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
I am thinking that it may have come from Bannerman’s???
-
-
Legacy Member
Maybe a Bannerman rifle???
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
steveu
Maybe a Bannerman rifle
Maybe...first US marked model I've seen. Wonder why someone would work so hard to sand out the original markings? The nosecap actually makes sense because the original bayonets weren't great and underwent changes themselves. I'd rather use the blades available locally... Someone here will know what took place...
-
-
Legacy Member
Maybe...first US marked model I've seen. Wonder why someone would work so hard to sand out the original markings? The nosecap actually makes sense because the original bayonets weren't great and underwent changes themselves. I'd rather use the blades available locally... Someone here will know what took place...
They did a great job on sanding the wood. I do like the look of the full length handguard.
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
steveu
They did a great job on sanding the wood.
They at least were a bit careful...
-
-
Legacy Member
Don't know why I didn't notice it at the first look, but someone also added a top forward handguard, where the original pattern rifle had none.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
jakester
Don't know why I didn't notice it at the first look, but someone also added a top forward handguard, where the original pattern rifle had none.
They did a very nice job of it too!
-
-
Legacy Member
Attachment 99224Attachment 99225
Maybe...first US marked model I've seen. Wonder why someone would work so hard to sand out the original markings? The nosecap actually makes sense because the original bayonets weren't great and underwent changes themselves. I'd rather use the blades available locally... Someone here will know what took place...
Rock Island was famous during reworks of firearms after WWII for obliterating all of the previous Arsenal markings and then applying their own markings. I wonder if that started in WWI? My MK II 3* just has the US stamp Ordnance Bomb and Serial along with the Canadian
stampings. I think it was one of the rifles sent to Ohio since the last owner had found it in a wall of a house in Kentucky that he was helping his father tear down in the '60's. The ones that went to the Camp in Illinois might have made a stop at Rock Island first.
I do agree that the full length hand guard has a nice look.
Last edited by bacarnal; 03-05-2019 at 09:45 PM.
-