-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
1942 Fazakerley No4 Mk1. Really nice rifle
-
07-26-2023 03:37 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
martin08
Anyway, what can the experts tell me? Don't be bashful. Thanks.
Well, it has a non standard part fitted.
The suffix A in the part number means that a fault was made during manufacture meaning that a standard part could not be used so a 'one-off' part was used. The A is a 'warning' to armourers that they may find that they cannot repair the rifle as standard parts will not fit.
There is no indication what the fault is, it could be as simple as a hole was drilled oversize and they had to tap it for the next size up bolt, or, it could be something major relating to the body / action.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
-
It's a nice tidy rifle from what I can see. The A suffix rifles are not uncommon, & although it meant that that they might be difficult when it came to repairs, it did not mean that they were unsafe to fire. I do not believe that it came out of ROFF looking like that. Firstly, it appears to have been black painted (quite probably suncorite) which was not in use in 1942. The original finish is more likely to have been oil blacked or blued early in the war. On top of this the charger bridge insert has been welded over. This occurred very commonly with repairs & refurbishment, as the little insert commonly worked loose, & 'slipping a gob of weld' on it was a sure fix.
I'm also not sure why the rifle serial has been stamped into the butt in the same place that scope numbers were stamped on No 4 T's......I don't think there was ever a requirement for it in UK
service, although no doubt someone will correct me on this if I have it wrong.
But it's a nice looking rifle regardless.
Last edited by Roger Payne; 07-27-2023 at 08:46 AM.
Reason: clarification
-
Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
The only 'import' mark is a tiny "U.K. .303 BR" on the left side of the receiver, and it cuts through the paint. Is this the original Suncorite finish? Thanks
Last edited by martin08; 07-26-2023 at 06:23 PM.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
It's a nice tidy rifle from what I can see. The A suffix rifles are not uncommon, & although it meant that that they might be difficult when it came to repairs, it did not mean that they were unsafe to fire. I do not believe that it came out of ROFF looking like that. Firstly, it appears to have been black painted (quite probably suncorite) which was not in use in 1942. The original finish is more likely to have been oil blacked early in the war. On top of this the charger bridge insert has been welded over. This occurred very commonly with repairs & refurbishment, as the little insert commonly worked loose, & 'slipping a gob of weld' on it was a sure fix.
I'm also not sure why the rifle serial has been stamped into the butt in the same place that scope numbers were stamped on No 4 T's......I don't think there was ever a requirement for it in
UK
service, although no doubt someone will correct me on this if I have it wrong.
But it's a nice looking rifle regardless.
I'll try to get the internal receiver pictures soon. It looks like a gun which was never refinished.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Here's a better angle of the charger bridge.
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
martin08
Is this the original Suncorite finish?
It can't be original suncorite can it? The charger bridge bears the proof of the spot weld to hold it tight and that was done well after the fact wasn't it? A repair for a loose charger bridge?
-
Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
It can't be original suncorite can it? The charger bridge bears the proof of the spot weld to hold it tight and that was done well after the fact wasn't it? A repair for a loose charger bridge?
Yes. Now I am researching that Suncorite was not applied to new rifles until '44 or very late '43 at the earliest. So this is post-production, but no FTR date as I have seen on others.
Thanks.
-
Legacy Member
The rear sight is still in the white.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
Bindi2
The rear sight is still in the white.
Yes. Rear sight is unfinished underneath, and the top surface is polished. Also in the white are the majority of the bolt body (handle is suncorite), the bolt head and face, and feedramp.
Rear of the charger bridge is also in the white.
Any significance to this? Thanks.

Last edited by martin08; 07-27-2023 at 08:29 AM.