Two interesting Lithgows serial number-wise.

[Sapper740]

I have two Lithgows in my collection of which neither are anything out of the ordinary save one thing: they are both very close to the beginning or end serial number range of the 1922 change from the MkIII* to the MkIII, then the subsequent 1941 change back to MkIII* production. The first, a MkIII* serial # B5806 was built in 1923 and was only serial numbered 100 away from the end of MkIII* production (A97165 to B5906). The second Lithgow, a No1 MkIII produced in 1941 serial # B64738 is only a few hundred into the range for the return to MkIII* production (B64240 to B76898). Some authors may want to narrow the published serial number range of when the change over took place.

Unfortunately, the No.1 MkIII* is a bitzer but the No.1 MkIII has a matching bolt, action body, and nose cap. I just recently picked it up at an auction for $400 and I'm looking forward to it being a good shooter.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[smerdon42]

I have 2 1915 lithgows one has a rack number 35302 ( serial is 26752 ) then i have another 1915 with serial number 35302.

[ufo8mydog]

I have two Lithgows in my collection of which neither are anything out of the ordinary save one thing: they are both very close to the beginning or end serial number range of the 1922 change from the MkIII* to the MkIII, then the subsequent 1941 change back to MkIII* production. The first, a MkIII* serial # B5806 was built in 1923 and was only serial numbered 100 away from the end of MkIII* production (A97165 to B5906). The second Lithgow, a No1 MkIII produced in 1941 serial # B64738 is only a few hundred into the range for the return to MkIII* production (B64240 to B76898). Some authors may want to narrow the published serial number range of when the change over took place.

Unfortunately, the No.1 MkIII* is a bitzer but the No.1 MkIII has a matching bolt, action body, and nose cap. I just recently picked it up at an auction for $400 and I'm looking forward to it being a good shooter.

I have A97167

[Homer]

I have two Lithgows in my collection of which neither are anything out of the ordinary save one thing: they are both very close to the beginning or end serial number range of the 1922 change from the MkIII* to the MkIII, then the subsequent 1941 change back to MkIII* production. The first, a MkIII* serial # B5806 was built in 1923 and was only serial numbered 100 away from the end of MkIII* production (A97165 to B5906). The second Lithgow, a No1 MkIII produced in 1941 serial # B64738 is only a few hundred into the range for the return to MkIII* production (B64240 to B76898). Some authors may want to narrow the published serial number range of when the change over took place.

Unfortunately, the No.1 MkIII* is a bitzer but the No.1 MkIII has a matching bolt, action body, and nose cap. I just recently picked it up at an auction for $400 and I'm looking forward to it being a good shooter.

Mate I’m not following this thread, can you please explain the point you’re trying to make.
Sorry not trying to be a smart arse

[Sapper740]

Mate I’m not following this thread, can you please explain the point you’re trying to make.
Sorry not trying to be a smart arse

I personally found it interesting that Lithgow switched back to MkIII production again after making MkIII* for decades. It was the proximity of the serial numbers of the two Lithgow rifles I own to the changes and that Lithgow switched back to MkIII production is what prompted me to research the change. Like many Lee Enfield collectors I'm into details.

[Homer]

Oh I see, but not quite. MkIII* from mid 1918 to early 1923 roughly, so not quite decades.
I think your data is incorrect. What’s your source?

[Sapper740]

Oh I see, but not quite. MkIII* from mid 1918 to early 1923 roughly, so not quite decades.
I think your data is incorrect. What’s your source?

The information I posted was gleaned from Table B-15 on page 131 and Table B-19 and B-20 on page 133 of Charles Stratton book "Volume 1 SMLE (No. 1) Rifles MkI and MkIII" According to the book you've got your dates wrong for years of production: MkIII* were made from 1913 to 1918, then again from 1940 to 1953. Mark III's were made continuously from 1913 to 1945. It's all in the book unless Mr. Stratton got it wrong.

[Homer]

The information I posted was gleaned from Table B-15 on page 131 and Table B-19 and B-20 on page 133 of Charles Stratton book "Volume 1 SMLE (No. 1) Rifles MkI and MkIII" According to the book you've got your dates wrong for years of production: MkIII* were made from 1913 to 1918, then again from 1940 to 1953. Mark III's were made continuously from 1913 to 1945. It's all in the book unless Mr. Stratton got it wrong.

Mate it’s absolutely incorrect

[Bindi2]

Stratton is wrong

[Sapper740]

Stratton is wrong

I tend to put too much faith in what I read in the books I have by Stratton, Skennerton et al. I'm always happy to be of assistance to others when questions are asked but on more than one occasion what I post from the experts turns out to be wrong.