Hi there,
I have attached some extra photos of the CLLE. The butt was shortened as is evident by the slightly shorter tang. I don't think it ever had any issue marks. Like you say, Ian had no...
Type: Posts; User: Aussie Long Tom; Excluded Forums: Milsurp Knowledge Libraries (READ ONLY)
Hi there,
I have attached some extra photos of the CLLE. The butt was shortened as is evident by the slightly shorter tang. I don't think it ever had any issue marks. Like you say, Ian had no...
Hi Roy,
I have to use my wife’s computer to post photos, so when she gets home I’ll add a few more. It is a bit of a bitsa also, barrel is a 1920’s Lithgow replacement, at least it’s a 30”...
Roy, I have something very similar, but just need to work out how to post photos. Give me a bit of time.....OK, edited photos in now. My rifle appears to have something like CCL officially...
I agree, a 28 would be MA, not a shield.
H model for me too. Factory conversion, hence the barrel serialed to match. Is the sight base numbered?
The main advice I can give is to buy a good quality NECK sizing die. You will get many more reloads per shell without having a broken shell stuck at an inconvenient time. For what it is worth, my...
I found a 1929 marked receiver with matching bolt but was rebarreled in 1946. The rear sight is marked to match the barrel and nose cap is Enfield. Original butt in nice condition with markings. If...
Can someone please tell me when you say 1929 - 30 there was 340 produced, are they stamped 1929 or 1930 on the receiver? I guessed it would be 1929 but wanted to check