+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: 11/44 ROF(F) No5 MkI with MkII rear sight

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    shmlnaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Last On
    08-23-2014 @ 10:56 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    11
    Local Date
    06-15-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 PM

    11/44 ROF(F) No5 MkI with MkII rear sight

    Here's my latest acquisition and my second Enfield for my WW2 collection. I was unaware of this interesting and seemingly rare WW2 era rear sight variation until I acquired the this rifle last Saturday.











    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:46 PM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,448
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 AM
    Why is that rifle cocked. Not a SAFE practice

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    shmlnaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Last On
    08-23-2014 @ 10:56 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    11
    Local Date
    06-15-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    Relax, it's stored with the bolt open and the three rules are always followed. It's just cocked for the pictures. The ammo in the pics never moves from the shelf either. Decocking would be more dangerous wouldn't it? Because, if a round did manage to find it's way into the rifle, the firing pin would then be resting on the primer!

  5. #4
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:46 PM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,448
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 AM
    Cycle the bolt several times to make sure your visual empty chamber mag look is actually empty close bolt holding trigger to the rear. Rifle now safe with less tension on the spring.
    A cocked rifle is an indication that the rifle is ready to fire and no one other than the person who cocked the rifle knows if it is loaded or not. To take photos of a rifle with the bolt open shows that the rifle is safe and not ready to fire.
    I store all my rifles with the bolt closed on an empty chamber. I dont take my bolts out for storage because that is one way to finish up with miss matched rifles. Which seems to be a big problem in the USAicon.

  6. #5
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 03:23 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,080
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    06-15-2024
    Local Time
    04:02 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bindi2 View Post
    Which seems to be a big problem in the USAicon.
    I don't really think that's the case...
    Regards, Jim

  7. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    shmlnaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Last On
    08-23-2014 @ 10:56 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    11
    Local Date
    06-15-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    I've heard of people who aren't gun people store bolts separately (and then lose them after a few years!). I've never heard of a collector storing the bolt separately however. Obviously it's a bad idea.

    I store the rifles bolt open so air can move through the bore. It helps prevent rust issues, especially if there's a risk of the rifle encountering humid air.

    Checking the firearm is empty when you pick it up is firearms 101 IMO (even though MANY people can't seem to grasp the concept, same with muzzle awareness!). The rifle is cocked, safety off for the pictures because I generally just think gun look better in that condition for pictures. These pictures are admittedly not the best, but I don't have my good camera right now and the one I do have isn't focusing well for some reason. That doesn't mean I change much else for how I compose my photos however. I usually make an effort to try to get my pictures to look good, including setting up the rifle itself in a way I find pleasing.
    Last edited by shmlnaaa; 02-17-2014 at 11:46 PM.

  9. #7
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:46 PM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,448
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    I don't really think that's the case...
    There are more reported miss matched bolts there than here by a long way.
    I have nearly been shot by a person whose safety practices were bad and did not improve with tuition , just brainless and Dumb. ADs are no fun at anytime when you are the RO or trainer and even less fun on a returned firearms first outing on returning from a gunsmith. I consider all firearms to be loaded until i have cleared them and consider cocked ones even more dangerous.

  10. Thank You to Bindi2 For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Legacy Member Paul S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-08-2020 @ 06:58 PM
    Location
    Back and forth between Sydney and Southern California
    Posts
    1,594
    Local Date
    06-15-2024
    Local Time
    06:02 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bindi2 View Post
    There are more reported miss matched bolts there than here by a long way.
    ...
    I would offer that the primary reason there are so many 'more reported miss matched bolts' in Yankland is that all the Enfields, excepting some of the Savage-made ones, have been imported and passed through heaven only knows how many sets of hands in the process. I'd wager not all of them care a dot if the bolts matched the rifles, and that to most of them regarding Enfields, 'one rifle, one bolt, one magazine' was the rule of the day.

    Admittedly, leaving any weapon cocked is not good practice, but after all we're not in the same room with it so ...

  12. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    shmlnaaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Last On
    08-23-2014 @ 10:56 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    11
    Local Date
    06-15-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    Funny, no one in my last thread made this big of a deal about rifles being cocked in the pictures. Now you all seem to want to comment on it. In fact, this is the first time anyone has said anything at all about it since I started collecting years ago. Everyone else that I know that take pictures of guns also like to set them up as they look when ready to fire also. Maybe there's slightly different safety protocols from country to country, but I've only seen people care about the usual stuff like muzzle sweeping, not checking to see if a rifle's loaded or not, and lack of trigger discipline. I argue that decocking and dry firing is less safe than leaving a bolt cocked since the process WILL set of a cartridge in the chamber (or leave the rifle so that any bump will cause a negligent discharge). Anyway, it's not like I leave rifles sitting around with the bolts closed (just closed for staged pictures, when I'm arguably in almost direct control of the rifle still). They are kept open in storage for reasons I previously mentioned in other posts. This includes semi-auto rifles and rimfires. Dry firing rimfires can damage them, so it is NOT to be done. It's also pretty pointless and can add needless wear to center-fire self loaders. Better to use a method of handling that's universal across all batteries of arms.

    https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=47555

    Heh, there are even two cocked rifles in one picture in that link! I'll make a note to use the more safe practice of leaving rifles cocked for any pictures I ever post here in the future (will require no extra effort since almost all are taken that way). You guys will just have to deal with it. I'm not going to change how I do my safely composed pictures with my safely handled firearms.

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul S. View Post
    I would offer that the primary reason there are so many 'more reported miss matched bolts' in Yankland is that all the Enfields, excepting some of the Savage-made ones, have been imported and passed through heaven only knows how many sets of hands in the process. I'd wager not all of them care a dot if the bolts matched the rifles, and that to most of them regarding Enfields, 'one rifle, one bolt, one magazine' was the rule of the day.

    ...
    If a lot of the other English speaking countries didn't have the extensive imports from all over the world that the US has historically had, then I bet you're right. I'm sure a lot of countries or groups didn't care about matching parts so long as the rifle worked. The more rifles were used also increases the likelihood that a part needs to be replaced or is just arbitrarily swapped for whatever reason.
    Last edited by shmlnaaa; 02-19-2014 at 03:49 AM.

  13. #10
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    06-13-2024 @ 11:55 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,528
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    12:02 AM
    All the theorising can be alleviated by simply following the FIRST rule of firearms/weapons that hammered into you from day one. Nothing to do with bolt open or closed but DO NOT EVER, NEVER, EVER POINT WEAPON TOWARDS ANYONE, EVEN IN JEST. If everyone followed that simple rule, the rest would be academic!

    I suppose the next one, a bit secondary, would be always make sure that before handing a weapon over, YOU check and clear it AND SO DOES HE!

    Re the Mk2 No5 backsights, I seem to recall that5 they were a common feature on the wartime made No5's. They certainly featured on our old ones
    Last edited by Peter Laidler; 02-18-2014 at 11:59 AM. Reason: speeeling misteaks

  14. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why do the Bren Mk3 and Bren MkII rear sights have the same part number?
    By Lee Enfield in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-26-2012, 03:03 PM
  2. Target front sight for No4 MKII
    By Calfed in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-10-2012, 10:30 AM
  3. M1 garand rear sight WW2 sight
    By nchristian in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 11:19 AM
  4. Rear sight base for Target Sight
    By m1903rifle in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 01:02 PM
  5. Ross MkII sight question
    By rayg in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 05:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts