+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: 1919 semi built vs full auto

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member alpaca andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    10-12-2020 @ 08:40 PM
    Location
    Keswick, Ontario
    Posts
    112
    Real Name
    Andrew
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    06:59 PM

    1919 semi built vs full auto

    Can someone with knowledge of the difference between semi built only and full auto 1919s explain the differences in receivers and parts. Looking more to the .308 versions. Im a total noob at this point on them and interested in building a semi version legal under Canadianicon law.

    Thanks,
    Andy
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    1943 White M4A1 Halftrack (now M2A1)

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 02:55 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,528
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    11:59 PM
    We had a couple of Canadianicon 7.62mm versions of the good old M1919 and to be really honest, they just didn't have the whooooomph to function reliably as machine guns. I stopped down the .718" (?) muzzle aperture in reducing stages to try to get it to act as a more efficient recoil booster but it didn't really make much difference. It was a case of diminishing returns in effect.

    I did speak to a couple of the Enfield design team who did our .300" rear sear L3 guns and they said that the original intention was to convert ours to 7.62mm at the same time but couldn't quite get to grips with it. So left them at .300" where they worked best.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 10:14 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,028
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    06:59 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    We had a couple of Canadianicon 7.62mm versions of the good old M1919 and to be really honest, they just didn't have the whooooomph to function reliably as machine guns. I stopped down the .718" (?) muzzle aperture in reducing stages to try to get it to act as a more efficient recoil booster but it didn't really make much difference. It was a case of diminishing returns in effect.

    I did speak to a couple of the Enfield design team who did our .300" rear sear L3 guns and they said that the original intention was to convert ours to 7.62mm at the same time but couldn't quite get to grips with it. So left them at .300" where they worked best.
    Hi Peter--

    Do you recall if the Browning you had were the C1 version or the later C5A1 version of the Browning?

    --fjruple

  5. #4
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 05:33 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,087
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    03:59 PM
    You're right Peter, we turtled along with them and the whole time I couldn't understand why we didn't have the MAG...

    Now to the OP's question, I know what we did to the ex autos to make them converted to semi in Canadaicon, but I'm not sure what was done when they made them semi auto from the factory. And that's what you're asking, right? Or because you're in Canada, do you want to know what we did to convert them?
    Regards, Jim

  6. #5
    Legacy Member alpaca andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    10-12-2020 @ 08:40 PM
    Location
    Keswick, Ontario
    Posts
    112
    Real Name
    Andrew
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    06:59 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks guys, yes I need to know the difference between the full auto right receiver and a semi auto only right receiver. Also are the internals different semi vs full or is it just the right receiver plates.
    Andy
    1943 White M4A1 Halftrack (now M2A1)

  7. #6
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 05:33 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,087
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    03:59 PM
    The ones in Canadaicon are ex full autos, is that what you're working with?
    Regards, Jim

  8. #7
    Legacy Member alpaca andy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    10-12-2020 @ 08:40 PM
    Location
    Keswick, Ontario
    Posts
    112
    Real Name
    Andrew
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    06:59 PM
    Thread Starter
    Actually I have a chance to buy a kit that contains a semi auto only right receiver, that was registered with the CFC as non restricted, previous to the deletion of the long gun registry. So Im trying to get all the info i can. All the parts are .308 I believe.
    1943 White M4A1 Halftrack (now M2A1)

  9. #8
    Advisory Panel tiriaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 06:19 PM
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,083
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    06:59 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by alpaca andy View Post
    Actually I have a chance to buy a kit that contains a semi auto only right receiver, that was registered with the CFC as non restricted, previous to the deletion of the long gun registry. So Im trying to get all the info i can. All the parts are .308 I believe.
    Apart from the RHSP, are any of the other parts altered for semi auto?
    You will need a semi auto trigger assembly, altered lockframe, barrel extension and bolt. The machining isn't necessarily complicated, but the parts are heat treated.

  10. #9
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 05:33 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,087
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    03:59 PM
    If you have the body, that's the worst of it. The problem here could be the internals. Most of them will be the same but I think the lock frame will differ greatly. Barrel and extension should be spot on and cover group. The bolt should be the same but the sear I believe has been altered. Warren on here will have a grasp I should think...and because he's in Canadaicon too it might be worth messaging him and pick his brain. It's sometimes hard to get his attention because he's busy. Just keep trying...
    Regards, Jim

  11. #10
    Legacy Member Vincent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-27-2020 @ 09:22 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,890
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    04:59 PM
    Lots of how to information here - 1919a4.com Forums

    Look for an Israeli 1919a4 parts kit. They are 7.62/.308 and some of the semi's I have seen worked well.

    Be very careful when working with the recoil spring guide rod. The spring is quite powerful and will launch the rod will a lot of force. There's a thread on that forum about a guy who lost an eye.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Semi-auto Bren new built receivers?
    By flying pig in forum The Semi-Automatic Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-16-2013, 07:45 AM
  2. Semi Auto .303
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-01-2013, 07:40 PM
  3. Why did the USA go semi-auto when others did not?
    By Amsdorf in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11-24-2011, 06:49 PM
  4. Semi-auto M14?
    By Stevo in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-19-2011, 03:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts