+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Photo examination of C-96 and Red 9

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM

    Photo examination of C-96 and Red 9

    Ok guys, here's a photo comparison between a pre-war (1911) C-96, and wartime Red 9.

    The two pistols in question:



    Red-9 close-up:



    Same area on the C-96. You can barely see the difference in machining quality, I was quite taken by the noteable difference in person. The Pre-war Commercial was MUCH nicer in it's finish.



    Red-9



    C-96



    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    Close-ups of the Red-9:













    NOTE THE PROOF/ACCEPTANCE stamp here. It is NOT present on the C-96.




  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    Disassembly of the Red 9:
























  5. Thank You to NavyShooter For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    Parts on the Red 9 with serial numbers:




  7. #5
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    Details on the C-96:





    Note here, the extractor was damaged and removed, and there's a pile of CLP goop in the extractor recess.







    Note this photo, there is no proof or acceptance stamp here as there was on the Red 9.


  8. #6
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    And here's the pistol disassembled:



















    Note, the bolt locking piece here does not match...apparently this is common, as this part is a "weak link."






  9. Thank You to NavyShooter For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    And there you are.

    Hopefully this has been useful.

    I purchased the Red 9 at a local gunshow, and part of the funding for that was the sale of the broken 7.63 Mauser.

    I have, effectively, the complete load-out, with repros of: stripper clips, shoulder stock, holster.

    The 1911 C-96 came through Century Arms back in the early 90's. It was in POOR shape, and despite the TLC I tried to give it, there's only so much you can do when the rifling is only a hint and a prayer....when fired, the bullets would hit the target side-ways at 10 meters.

    Oh, and it appears to me that the Red 9 no longer has it's original sight, and instead has one from a .30 pistol, as it's supposed to be calibrated out to 500m instead of the 1000m that the .30 is.

    Enjoy!

    NS

  11. #8
    Moderator
    (Deceased January 2016)


    Harlan (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-04-2016 @ 04:42 PM
    Location
    Texas - USA
    Age
    65
    Posts
    3,727
    Real Name
    Harlan
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    Awesome pistols and photo display NavyShooter!

    Thank you for putting it together!

    ~ Harlan

  12. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    09-02-2018 @ 08:20 AM
    Location
    Bavaria, Germany
    Posts
    1,657
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    09:33 PM
    Hey i like the C 96 ! And it is always nice to see that on pre war an early war models every single part has its number. We shoot them at the BDMP and they are very accurate. We made 2 years in a row the first place with it at our championships!!

    Great guns, great pics

    Regards

    Gunner

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Need help with photo please
    By valter in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-05-2010, 11:26 PM
  2. WW1 photo
    By Mk VII in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 01:59 PM
  3. WW1 photo
    By Mk VII in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-11-2009, 04:35 PM
  4. WW2 M1 photo
    By twobravo in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-21-2009, 03:05 AM
  5. Photo of course.
    By Lancebear in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-04-2009, 11:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts