+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: "filed" Swedish diopter sights

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Calfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last On
    05-30-2025 @ 12:44 AM
    Location
    Land of the Free
    Age
    70
    Posts
    1,014
    Local Date
    06-07-2025
    Local Time
    06:03 PM

    "filed" Swedish diopter sights

    I've got two sets of Elit diopter sights for a Swedishicon Mauser. One looks like it has been ground or filed on the mounting surface to fit the rear bridge of the rifle, while one is "pristine", with several ridges on the bottom.

    Anyone know what the deal is with the "filing" the bottom of the one and whether I need to file the pristine one to mount it?



    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    06-08-2025
    Local Time
    03:03 AM
    Gunner, the left hand one looks as if it may have been filed to fit a large-ring Mauser action. In which case it will sit nicely on a Gew98/K98icon, but rock on a Carl Gustaf. The right hand one should not require filing, but does, alas, require drilling the bridge to take the mounting screw.

    See Schinke, "Die leichte schwedischen Infanteriegewehre" PP 135-138.

    Patrick

  3. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    metzgeri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last On
    04-02-2014 @ 01:06 AM
    Posts
    32
    Local Date
    06-07-2025
    Local Time
    09:03 PM
    Very interesting opinion, Patrick!!! It's always great to have many heads working on this sort of thing.

    I originally guessed it was to lower the diopter and therefore lower Point of Impact (POI) for the rounds fired at short distance (100m)....however, your idea is plausible too.

    Calfed, can you show pictures with both of these diopters sitting on top of an m/96 reciever bridge (from the rear, of course)? Do they both contour to the bridge? I don't know if there is a difference in bridge contours between '96 and '98 actions or not.

    I do, however, have one doubt in your idea, Patrick. There is a post on another forum that shows an Elit diopter specifically made for the large ring '98 mauser. This Elit diopter is not short, but rather taller and more bulky. It came straight from Swedenicon and is claimed to be from the inventor of the Elit diopter (I think).

    metzgeri

  4. #4
    Legacy Member Calfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last On
    05-30-2025 @ 12:44 AM
    Location
    Land of the Free
    Age
    70
    Posts
    1,014
    Local Date
    06-07-2025
    Local Time
    06:03 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks.

    Opinions seem to boil down to it was done to lower the POI at shorter distances, or it was done to fit a 98 series Mauser.

    The rear bridges on my 98 Mausers seem to be very close or identical to the rear bridge on my Swede 96's, so not sure about the latter explanation.

    I'll try to get a pic of them sitting on the M96 and the K98icon rear bridge

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Hello...My Names is "Sights"
    By Sights in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 03:06 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts