+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: SMLE Markings

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

Bruce_in_Oz SMLE Markings 10-15-2012, 01:57 AM
jmoore No photos of that area,... 10-15-2012, 03:40 AM
Son I have pics of the T... 10-15-2012, 06:28 AM
muffett.2008 This is a 1916 lithgow.37590 10-15-2012, 07:20 AM
Son Nope, this wasn't a T mark... 10-15-2012, 07:59 AM
jrhead75 I've got an early butt with... 10-15-2012, 08:05 AM
Peter Laidler There's no mention of this in... 10-15-2012, 09:24 AM
Son Will flick this question... 10-15-2012, 09:46 AM
Steve H. in N.Y. Buttstock 10-15-2012, 01:44 PM
Homer Excellent piece of info about... 10-15-2012, 05:14 PM
breakeyp Australian cutaway showing... 10-15-2012, 05:24 PM
muffett.2008 Ya wanna sell?:super: ... 10-15-2012, 05:46 PM
Bruce_in_Oz Peter, and others: The... 10-15-2012, 06:06 PM
muffett.2008 You mean these? 37608 10-16-2012, 07:02 AM
Bruce_in_Oz Them's the ones...... ... 10-16-2012, 04:54 PM
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:12 PM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,284
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    05:44 PM

    SMLE Markings

    Trivia time.

    Can a few folk have a quick look at their SMLE rear sight beds, left hand side, please.

    A 1943 vintage note I came across recently stated that rear sight beds on Mk111 and 111* SMLEs were to have a small, upper case "T" stamped on their left side, just above the locking pin.

    This was to indicate that this pin entered from the LEFT side and was TAPERED.

    This note dates to 1938, or earlier. My copy of the drawing has extensive damage along the bottom edges especially along the bottom, where one should find the title block / amendments information.

    Anyone know when this locking pin was introduced?

    And another thing:

    I have never owned any early pattern SMLEs. So, has anyone ever closely examined an early SMLE butt. It appeared that there is supposed to be TWO additional lightening holes below the Stock bolt / pull-through hole. These are drilled at such an angle that they meet at a point below, and just behind alignment with the head of the stock bolt. It also seems that the weight of the pull-through resides in a generously-dimensioned, elliptically profiled hole above stock-bolt hole. This is quite different from the close-fitting job on proper Mk111* butts. I guess they were trying to trim ounces and keep the overall balance forward.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    03:44 AM
    No photos of that area, sorry! Plenty of top views but nothing from the left side.

    As far as the butt hollows go, there's definitely some variations. Weight differentials aren't all that noticable unless they're stripped down.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Advisory Panel Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    01-18-2025 @ 07:22 PM
    Location
    On the right side of Australia, below the middle and a little bit in from the edge.
    Posts
    1,239
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    06:44 PM
    I have pics of the T somewhere, ages ago when asking about it's relevance. Will dig it up. Alsoi have a butt like described, but not sure if I have pics

  5. #4
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:16 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,205
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    05:44 PM
    This is a 1916 Lithgowicon.Attachment 37590

  6. Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Advisory Panel Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    01-18-2025 @ 07:22 PM
    Location
    On the right side of Australia, below the middle and a little bit in from the edge.
    Posts
    1,239
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    06:44 PM
    Nope, this wasn't a T mark after all... chuck it back in the bin and keep looking I 'spose

    Attachment 37591

  8. #6
    Legacy Member jrhead75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    02-03-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    354
    Local Date
    05-15-2025
    Local Time
    11:44 PM
    I've got an early butt with the two lightening holes. If nobody comes up with one before then, I'll get some pics up this afternoon.

  9. #7
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:59 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,654
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    08:44 AM
    There's no mention of this in the pommy EMER's Bruce and Son. Was it a particularly Aust thing? I ask because something like this letter or a number stamped somewhere that indicated a completed modification would usually be mentioned in the technical data or unit repairs section or if later, in the modification section.

  10. #8
    Advisory Panel Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    01-18-2025 @ 07:22 PM
    Location
    On the right side of Australia, below the middle and a little bit in from the edge.
    Posts
    1,239
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    06:44 PM
    Will flick this question straight onto Bruce, Peter. I had asked about it some time ago, also had a "T" stamped on the underside of a Lithgowicon foreend forward of the front trigger guard screw, and no explanation for either. Sounds like this solves the sight marking... over to you, Bruce...

  11. #9
    Legacy Member Steve H. in N.Y.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:05 PM
    Location
    You get one guess
    Posts
    526
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    03:44 AM

    Buttstock

    On a 1917 LSA. Not sure if it's original to the rifle or not.Attachment 37592

  12. Thank You to Steve H. in N.Y. For This Useful Post:


  13. #10
    Legacy Member Homer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    04-29-2025 @ 09:09 PM
    Posts
    661
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    05:44 PM
    Excellent piece of info about the T stamp Bruce. I've got several rifles with this stamp and I've wondered about this for years. Don't have any photo's on hand but I can take some for you when time permits. From memory it is not present on any of my barrels dated up to 1924 but on all dated after this up until when you say, about 1938. That could be wrong, just going off memory here.

    Thanks for the info, now could you please find the meaning of the question mark stamp on early Lithgowicon actions.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Question on SMLE Markings
    By Robert303 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-23-2012, 07:51 PM
  2. Another SMLE sling, markings?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 05:09 AM
  3. Smle????
    By Missing Something in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-01-2010, 07:50 AM
  4. My other SMLE
    By iringtwice in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-05-2010, 09:57 AM
  5. nota smle per se: but a 22 with all the British markings
    By Pelago in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-11-2009, 10:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...
Milsurps Voice Mail