+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: January 15, 1941

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:30 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,470
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    09:15 AM

    January 15, 1941

    On January 15, 1941, this Winchester receiver was stamped with the serial number 100931

    This information was from Canfield's book "The M1icon Garand RifleAttachment 68784
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 10 Members Say Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:22 AM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,265
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    10:15 AM

    At SA

    On January 15, 1941 at Springfield, receivers 167941 and 174469 were scrapped because of defective sight serrations
    Real men measure once and cut.

  4. Thank You to Bob Seijas For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:30 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,470
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    09:15 AM
    Thread Starter

    serration on M1 receivers

    Attachment 68787Attachment 68785[ATTACH=CONFIG]68786[/ATTACH

    By Springfield serial number 195862 the circular recess had been added to production receivers and by Winchester 104298 this circular recess had also been added (once in awhile you will find the odd Winchester with the old flat side serrations way of sequence

  6. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:22 AM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,265
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    10:15 AM
    I wonder if that was just designed to locate the area better or was part of a redesigned machining procedure to cut them right... SA was getting an awful lot of rejects for serrations either out of place or not deep enough. In February 187236 and 198845 were scrapped for the same reason. They seem to stop after that.
    Real men measure once and cut.

  8. #5
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:30 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,470
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    09:15 AM
    Thread Starter
    Whatever the reason, one thing is certain, it was important enough that both Springfield and Winchester both added the circular recess cut at about the same time in production in early 1941.

  9. #6
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:22 AM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,265
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    10:15 AM
    Agreed, if Winchester did it without getting paid extra, it must have saved them money. Badly done serrations would have ruined the receiver because they couldn't recut them without first filling in the badly done ones. I'm sure they had fewer than SA because their production was so much smaller, but they must have had some. WRA never changed anything else without submitting an expense reimbursement request.
    Real men measure once and cut.

  10. #7
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:30 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,470
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    09:15 AM
    Thread Starter
    The circular radius cut was added to the receiver drawing under revision -3 21 in June 1940 and the tolerance was changed on 08-08-40 under revision 5. It took almost five months to get to the production of both Springfield and Winchester receivers

  11. #8
    Legacy Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2025 @ 01:02 PM
    Location
    Syracuse NY
    Posts
    115
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    10:15 AM
    My 190xxx does not have the circular recess.....

  12. #9
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:22 AM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,265
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    10:15 AM

    Avo

    Yes, we see that often... a change is made months before a new drawing. They called them AVOs, verbal orders to change.
    Real men measure once and cut.

  13. Thank You to Bob Seijas For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. *** January 2012 Purchases ***
    By Badger in forum The Members Showcase (REPLY ONLY)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-26-2012, 05:52 PM
  2. *** January 2011 Purchases ***
    By Badger in forum The Members Showcase (REPLY ONLY)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-26-2011, 06:16 PM
  3. *** January 2010 Purchases ***
    By Badger in forum The Members Showcase (REPLY ONLY)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-17-2010, 09:22 AM
  4. *** January 2009 Purchases ***
    By Badger in forum The Members Showcase (REPLY ONLY)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-01-2009, 07:00 PM
  5. January 2009 Newsletter.....
    By Badger in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-29-2009, 07:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts