I was wondering about how much mv loss the #5 rifle has compared to the same ammo in a #4. One older book I have lists the #5's mv at 2000 fps. A general rule of thumb of 50fps loss per inch, would put it (taking from 2400fps) at maybe 2110fps, just a guess. Was wondering if anyone has chronographed mv of both a #5 and #4 with the same Mk 7 ball ammo or equivalent handloads.
Are the micrometer sights graduated for one click=one MOA?
Is the zero for the battlesight on the #5 sight supposed to be the same as for the battlesight on the #4? Reason I ask, is that the #5's battlesight is set considerably lower towards the axis pin than the #4 sight. It shows a whole lot of the elevation knob within the apecture's picture, compared to the #4 sight.
What are people's various experiences as to the...call it "honesty"... of the graduations of the micrometer rear sight with ball ammo? I trust the adjustments of the M1/M14sights and have learned how to do backlash compensation for them. Much more elevation backlash seems to exist with the Enfield rear sight. Once backlash compensating is done, is the elevation scale pretty honest for both #5 and #4 rear sights?
Last question: Looking around for bullets, it seems as if the best buy on bullets from a company that actually has them, it to buy Sierra Match Kings in quantity (Hornady FMJs seem to be out of stock). But I've seen Hornady hunting bullets deform under recoil while in the mag. Has anybody used SMKs in an Enfileld mag and could comment on what damage if any is done to the bullet tips in the mag?
I realize that the best answers come from range time. The questions have been answered already at some time in the past, and I'm trying to save on ammo and components by picking other people's brains. Thanks for your help.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.