Thanks to the replies, observations and comments to Cosine26, Johnny Peppers, Calif-Steve, and of course, Rick the Librarian! First I want to say I am thrilled that it looks like this is in fact an authentic NRA Sporter, just one that isn't 100% original from the factory. In fact, there happens to be what is described as an all-original NRA Sporter at this link, http://www.auctionarms.com/closed/di...mnum=8202108.0, and the serial number on that rifle is only 50 or so units off of my serial number (and i think star-gauged barrels were made is batches). So based on previous research I conducted via the Internet, and referenceing two books I have on the M1903, it is cool that my initial observations appear to have been correct (authentic NRA Sporter in non-original condition). I will be more thrilled, however, once i know the wood stock is indeed original. I mean, the front sight's originality is not a big deal to me---and i could easily replace it with an original front sight, and not really "mutilate" or "devalue" the weapon (the one thing I don't like about the front sight? it covers the SA numbers/symbols on top of the barrel!). But the fact that the gun doesn't have a barrel band does strike me as strange---because wouldn't removing the band leave an indelible mark, or screw hole, or some sign on the barrel or stock that would suggest that at one time there was something there that is now missing? And this relates to the stock---I am really hoping the stock is original (obviously i don't care if it was properly resized to fit the buyer), because let's face it: outside of the barrel/bolt/receiver, the stock is a very important part of the weapon---at least to me as far as originality goes. But if its the original stock, then wouldn't i be able to maybe one day find a proper NRA Sporter barrel band, and install it again without "mutilating/devalue" the weapon? I mean, if it can be removed and not mark the weapon, then couldn't one easily be re-installed? So here are a few questions if I may ask, as i really am interested in this family/firearm piece of history:
For Johnny Peppers: 1) So you do feel its an original stock? But then how was the buttplate "modified & retained"? 2) Isn't there more checkering on this rifle stock than what came on production NRA Sporter stocks?
For Cosine26: 1) Look at the link I gave above, and you'll see lots of pics of what is advertised (and looks correct to me) as a 100% original NRA Sporter. Compare the pics of that Lyman Sight and how its mounted with mine, because that gun is only about 50 units off from mine serial number-wise. Then tell me what you think? 2) What is an SRS Letter, and how do I pay for someone to do a archive assessment of my rifle (I assume an SRS is some sort of authentication service?).
For Caif-Steve: Thanks for the links and contact info. I will look those guys up before i leave. As for my stock: 1) Is my stock supposed to have a "circled 'P'" on it? My stock has no marks stamped on it. I will try to attach more photos to help you guys help me. I really appreciate this you guys, and this helps keep me busy when I'm bored!