-
Legacy Member
-
-
01-25-2015 04:01 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
Valkyrie at least functions as the original...doesn't it? They are made duplicate?
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Great picture. Thanks Great to see any pictures of a De Lisle !
Thanks again
Pete
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
enfield 111
Just to clarify, the firearm that is being offered here has a dummy shroud around a full length barrel that is in no way a suppressor or a suppressed firearm under Canadian Law. There is no reduction in the sound of the 45 cartridge.
Then why are we even discussing the Delisle? They can't be produced for consumption in Canada and I'll be a dollar you can't send them to the US...too expensive for a dummy gun.
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Hi Enfield 111
Just a quick question about the barrel for your rifle. Did you machine any of the bolt channel out for the barrel when you set it back for the 45ACP or just make it the same diameter as the bolt channel?
-
-
According to David Howroyd, it was this single operation (see thread 56) that caused the problems that made each DeLisle a virtual one-off. The bodies were all used to the point of being worn out (that's why they were suitable for the low power round of course) and from different manufacturers so there really was no 'standard' or datum to work from. As for the supposed accuracy of then - at fanciful ranges and......... Someone said that mysterious aura surrounding them is the only thing that ensures that they deserve a place in firearms folklore
-
-
Advisory Panel
With only a hundred odd examples made, production was too low to allow any sort of series manufacture to be established. Lots of individual fitting. The Charlton, with what, 1200? examples would have required much more of an organized approach to production.
desky85 - the receiver must be bored out from the front. The diameter of the boltway is far too small to allow a .45 barrel to be installed. No doubt there are many options for how the receiver may be bored out. One method that works is to install a mandrel in the rear of the receiver which may be chucked in the lathe. A bushing is threaded into the receiver ring, projecting out far enough to be supported in the steady rest. The axis of the receiver is aligned with the axis of the lathe. The receiver may be then drilled and bored out to the desired diameter. When the bolt is shortened, and the bolthead refitted, the length of the bolt body and timing of the bolthead are related. This affects how far the receiver is bored out to accept the extended barrel.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Hi Jim
Not sure why you say the copy I am making is not for consumption in Canada. A De Lisle without a suppressor is still a functional De Lisle just no noise reduction. It will be a non-restricted gun so any collector with a PAL can own and shoot and a cool part of the British Commando history and a great addition to anyone with a serious Enfield collection.
Desky85 the No1 Mk 3 receiver is bored out to accept the 45 barrel and the bolt is shortened accordingly.
-
Legacy Member
That seems like a lot of work. Subsonic 300 AAC Blackout - 7.62×35mm has about the same bullet weight as .45 ACP. It would be a fairly simple job to shorten and re-chamber a 7.62x51mm barrel to 7.62×35mm.
-