+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Fitting & machining of bracket pads blanks on a No#4

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    05-08-2025 @ 06:46 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,651
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    05-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:54 PM
    Seems like you really have made a mountain out of a molehill there Brian! Mind you with all those facilities....... We often used to encounter sheared-off spigots from the front pads of L42 rifles caused by the additional rotational forces of the 7.62mm rounds against the moments of the bracket. Just insert an accurately made sleeve into the front pad as illustrated in the little H&H book and this will cure your need for the shell mill cutter. The perfect fit of the pad spigot into the corresponding opening in the bracket is critical for one of the woprkshop inspection stages.

    Make sure that you read up on the article about making up a decent repro No4T too
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member BrianLara400*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last On
    06-04-2024 @ 08:10 AM
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    05-11-2025
    Local Time
    12:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    Seems like you really have made a mountain out of a molehill there Brian! Mind you with all those facilities.......
    Yeah undoubtedly I have, though if nothing else that venerable little H&H book impressed upon me the importance of not fluffing up the collimation process.
    If in part that involves rolling up my sleaves to ensure I'm building with the best possible componentry so be it

    The turning of the spigot as a seperate insert, certainly alleviates the need for a shell mill and I'd suggest offers a higher level of control over the O.D. rather than just plunging and accepting the resulting spigot (whether that still be within tolerance or not). The concerning thing about a shell mill may be the potential for it to wander whilst plunging, given it would be fairly heavily engaged on one side. - will ponder that one a little longer.


    Peter do you happen to recall how well the repaired spigots faired when returned back into service i.e did they fail with a higher incidence after they'd been repaired the once?
    Also you mention in the book that some front pads would occasionally work loose over time as recoil took its toll (as these don't have the additional assistance of the 1/4"bsf thumbscrew passing directly through into the action body as per the rear pad).
    As I've got the opportunity to do things from scratch, would you consider the dowelled bush method of securing the front body pad a worth while thing to try?


    JMoore, I've got some silver steel of the right size and a tempering oven etc so making a shell mill isn't out of the question - and your right the outside diameter isn't critical +/-.
    Just have to make sure to make sure it behaves and the ID cuts a resulting spigot within that tight .369-.370" tolerance band @ .120" deep.



    Also spotted a few dimensional errors with the freshened up drawings in the Knowledge Libraryicon, so will submit a few corrections once I've finished working through it all.

    Thanks for all the comments, will keep people updated on the progress!
    Last edited by BrianLara400*; 02-24-2015 at 06:51 AM.

  4. Thank You to BrianLara400* For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No 4 (T) scope bracket / pads - correct thread size?
    By RobD in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-18-2014, 08:27 AM
  2. No 32 Scope fitting with mismatched brackets and pads.
    By jss in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-12-2014, 10:43 AM
  3. Machining No4 receiver to take 7.62 mag
    By tbonesmith in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-07-2011, 08:05 AM
  4. The 'No-Machining' 1911 Project
    By Newsfeed Hound in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-20-2010, 06:20 PM
  5. No.4 body machining
    By RossM10 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-15-2010, 05:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts