-
Legacy Member
-
-
08-30-2015 10:51 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
I would say that the ex No42/53 scope caps with the ring thing snipped off would be early 70's or so, after their actual scopes were obsolete. But once things trickle into the system as 'slow movers' they tended to stay around for ages so you'd still see them until the 80's or so. But to be honest, the average Armourer wouldn't differentiate between any of the various sorts.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
I would say that the ex No42/53 scope caps with the ring thing snipped off would be early 70's or so, after their actual scopes were obsolete. But once things trickle into the system as 'slow movers' they tended to stay around for ages so you'd still see them until the 80's or so. But to be honest, the average Armourer wouldn't differentiate between any of the various sorts.
Peter, am I to assume that the No42 refers to 1942 dated caps and No.53 to 1953 dated. Sorry for being so un-knowledgeable, Ray
-
-
Er....., no! No42 means the No42 telescope and No53, the No53 telescopes that were tank co-axial telescopes optically identical to the No32. Someones's bound to ask me next why a telescope in a tank turret would need eye caps............ The only reason why the optical systems inside tank turrets have covers is due to the cordite and main charge fumes leaving a thick greasy smeary film on the lenses. Hence flaps/covers on the periscope/sights etc etc
-
-
Legacy Member
Sorry still very confused, but what scope was the no.42 caps used for. I under stand the N0.53 caps were for the tank scope. Was the no. 42 the one used for the No.32 scopes? Ray
Last edited by rayg; 08-30-2015 at 08:22 PM.
-
-
Legacy Member
-
-
Legacy Member
Quote: Anyone have an idea if they are early or late war, Brit or Canadian
, postwar, Indian? Quote:
Thank you, confusion cleared up after reading Peter's article you posted I understand now. No.42 & No.53 are not the cap pattern dates but the scopes they are for. Because of OP's posted question regarding dates, I was thinking in terms of dates not scope/patterns, I understand now. Ray
Last edited by rayg; 08-31-2015 at 07:50 AM.
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
henry r
I think that's a No71 reticule isn't it with the numbers 6 to 14? The No.53s I've seen had a four post reticule stepping down in thickness about halfway along each post and with an open center to the field of view.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
Legacy Member
my no.71 is different (i'll add a picture shortly).
i just went off how the original picture was captioned.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Thanks.
Interesting how they were able to fit an etched glass reticule to the No71, but not to the No32. There was a trial done in 1944/45 which recommended a modified reticule including a two-thickness crossbar or horizontal wire. The reason obviously was that in low light you can then find the heavier horizontal bar as easily as the vertical post and use the two to align on the target without actually seeing the tip of the post or the crosswire/horizontal bar, as you can with the German
or No.8 reticule. Some of the WWI German scopes went one better and had a short vertical bar projecting down from the top of the field of view; to be used against the lighter skyline of course.
Last edited by Surpmil; 09-06-2015 at 12:54 AM.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post: