Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Canadian Lee Enfield No. 4 Mk I (T)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #13
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,008
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:33 PM
    Very interesting Warren, thank you for sharing that.

    Transcript of the text:

    Measure of Jump 13 May 1944
    The following data was compiled at the request of Maj. B.L. Anderson of D.12, C.M.H.Q. The figures were arrived at by aligning the axis of the bore on the horizontal line of a screen at a range of 71 feet 7" the bore being relayed [sic] after each shot by sighting the telescope on a mark coinciding with the correct original lay. The shots fired struck the screen above the horizontal line with the amount in minutes determined by rule measurement in inches transferring to minutes, assuming that one minute of angle at 71 feet 7" is equal to .25 inches. By adding the drop due to gravity, in this case 0.166 inches a reasonably accurate figure is obtained. Figures given are the distances of five shots fired from each rifle, above the centre of the horizontal line measured in inches.
    Seems logical to assume that LB would make up the regular rifles for contracts, [No.4 Mk.I* or No.4 Mk.I*(T)] in the usual way, but if they wanted rifles for experimental purposes, they might have made them up from suitable actions/rifles which could have been pre-production or early production rifles that were not accounted for in a contract, or were rejected for some defect that did not make them unsuitable for whatever trial was being conducted.

    There's a rifle in Without Warning that was made up as a gift for Maj. Hahn, who was head of the War Production Board in WWII, and in WWI chief of the intelligence section of the Canadianicon Corps. They used a recycled No.4(T) action no less; the plugged rear pad holes can be seen in the photo. You'd think a presentation like that would use a new receiver, but perhaps new receivers were all accounted for? I've got an un-numbered 1943 action that has the 4BA holes in the receiver with a piece of a tap broken off in one of them, and the holes set back about 1/4". A "missing link" screw-up from 1943? Maybe. Someone later built it up into a sporter and it turned up at a local gunshow.

    In other words I don't think they threw much away at Long Branch if it could possibly be used for some purpose at some time.

    Too bad no one asked these gents when they were alive as now we can only make what seem like logical guesses.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 02-06-2017 at 10:44 AM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  2. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Canadian WW1 Naval lee Enfield
    By harlton in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-07-2014, 03:18 AM
  2. Lee Enfield No4 Longbranch CANADIAN EH!
    By shaunman79 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-09-2012, 05:36 PM
  3. Canadian Lee Enfield Cavalry Carbine
    By K31 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-08-2011, 09:16 PM
  4. Canadian and Commonwealth Enfield Slings
    By Cantom in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-16-2007, 02:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts