+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Gallipoli and dysentery

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:45 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,283
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    08:59 PM
    Infections from wounds, as well as almost non-existent sanitary practices probably carried off more troops than direct combat up to WW2.

    In the last great unpleasantness, the Allies had bulk antibiotics, mostly sourced from Penicillin "Pharms" in Canadaicon and the USAicon.

    Because they had basically NO penicillin, Axis deaths from wounds, injuries and diseases were disproportionately higher.

    The US Civil war and the Crimean War saw the first glimmers of a systematic approach to casualty treatment, but "finesse" was somewhat lacking. Lots of Carbolic acid and alcohol being splashed about, with a vague notion of "antisepsis, but the introduction of practical "asepsis" (keeping the bugs out so you do not have to fight them later), started to nudge the death-rate down. It was the same in civilian hospitals. Stories of doctors walking straight from a messy autopsy into a delivery room without changing gowns or washing hands do not boost confidence regarding the survival of mother or baby..

    The much later introduction of "Keyhole" surgery (making the smallest possible incision to do the job) also saw a reduction in recovery times and post-op infections. Slicing frm the sternum to the groin to deal with a feral gall bladder or similar, was an iatrogenic death waiting to happen.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,008
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    03:59 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    Infections from wounds, as well as almost non-existent sanitary practices probably carried off more troops than direct combat up to WW2.

    In the last great unpleasantness, the Allies had bulk antibiotics, mostly sourced from Penicillin "Pharms" in Canadaicon and the USAicon.

    Because they had basically NO penicillin, Axis deaths from wounds, injuries and diseases were disproportionately higher.

    The US Civil war and the Crimean War saw the first glimmers of a systematic approach to casualty treatment, but "finesse" was somewhat lacking. Lots of Carbolic acid and alcohol being splashed about, with a vague notion of "antisepsis, but the introduction of practical "asepsis" (keeping the bugs out so you do not have to fight them later), started to nudge the death-rate down. It was the same in civilian hospitals. Stories of doctors walking straight from a messy autopsy into a delivery room without changing gowns or washing hands do not boost confidence regarding the survival of mother or baby..

    The much later introduction of "Keyhole" surgery (making the smallest possible incision to do the job) also saw a reduction in recovery times and post-op infections. Slicing frm the sternum to the groin to deal with a feral gall bladder or similar, was an iatrogenic death waiting to happen.
    There are other effective "herbal" antiseptics of course. Have read that garlic juice was used in WWI to good effect and of course honey itself being hygroscopic is an excellent antiseptic. Have also read that in WWI the Russians included a clay powder with the soldier's rations and that this was highly effective for dysentery. The lessons from the case of Dr. Semmelweis are timeless. Women were still dying of "iatragenic" "puerperal fever" by the tens of thousands generations after his death.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Excellent Gallipoli movie
    By Milsurp Collector in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-18-2010, 01:36 PM
  2. Gallipoli: ANZAC cove......the monument
    By Warren in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-15-2007, 09:24 AM
  3. Anzac - Gallipoli Marksman
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2006, 08:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts