-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Krag Carbine Help..........(Pics)
Hello,
I'm a first time poster here, but this seems to be the best place for info.
I have the opportunity to buy a Krag
Carbine from a friend. He is in his early 70's and the gun belonged to his Grandfather who had a long and distinguished millitary career including the Spanish American War. This carbine has been tucked away in his closet for years and it appears to be in excellent condition to me, but I'm surely not an expert. The receiver is marked " 1895", but the stock is stamped 1896, the S.N.-28026. It is missing the bar and ring, but otherwise I think it's all original. I'd appreciate some opinions on the overall condition and approx. value of this carbine. This will help make a decision to purchase or not. I have several pics that I'll try to post.
Thanks!
ImageShack Gallery
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
08-06-2009 01:08 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Stock is later than the receiver as you noted. Rear sight is a rifle sight. Bolt bits are from an 1892 rifle.
Bayonet is for an 1895 Mannlicher if I'm not mistaken. Most carbines don't have bayonets anyway - mounted dudes had swords.
So, no, it's not "all original." Then again I'm the one that's pretty convinced that 99% of the "original" US Krags, aren't.
Nice gun. I like it. Needs a bit of help but nothing too bad. Chuck might notice other bits.
Cheers.
-
-
Deceased July 6th, 2010
If you don't buy it, others here sure would like to, including me!
I don't see much wrong with that carbine. The sling bar is not hard to come by. They run about $60-$75 on average. The rear screw in the sling bar cut out is not correct, Another easy fix.
Curious about the bolt. it looks like it has a model 1892 bolt sleeve (grooves around sleeve by the safety lever) Could you post some pictures of the bolt from different angles?
I usually don't price a piece from pictures but I have seen a lot less carbines with asking prices around $1500
It's a nice 1st group carbine that would be easily restored.
FWIW
Chuck
If you do not buy it, I would be interested in it.
-
Deceased July 6th, 2010
Joe,
look at that rear sight again :0)
Chuck
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thanks Guys!
Here's the deal.......I think I'm going to buy this gun unless you guys point out something out of bounds with it. He let me take it home with me tonight to clean it up and check out the bore. It looks just great to me! I snapped a bunch more pictures and have posted a link below.
He also showed me his Grandfather's service record which included the Spanish American War, and he also had some metals from Cuba. So, I think this may be a real find!
I sent an email with the S.N. to the Springfield Armory Research Service to see if they have any records to authenticate military use of this carbine.
Please......This has been an Awesome learning process for me. If anything in the pics. jumps out at you......let me know. There is a wealth of knowledge here on this forum.
Thanks!
ImageShack Gallery
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
chuck in idaho
Joe,
look at that rear sight again :0)
Chuck
Yes, it was a quick look, there is a much nicer picture up now - nice carbine sight.
It's a nice gun regardless of the stock and bolt bits. The bolt bits are 1892 but that's an easy fix.
"I think I'm going to buy this gun unless you guys point out something out of bounds with it."
Yes, do so. It's a nice carbine.
-
Deceased July 6th, 2010
Just for safe measures:
Close the bolt and run a cleaning rod down to the bolt face. Mark the rod at the muzzel, take it out and measure it. Should be exactly 22".
Look at the base of the front sight where it is dove tailed into the barrel. The color of the solder/brazing should be a gold/bronze color, NOT silver.
Please let us know?
One more thing, Look in the but trap. How many holes do you see for the cleaning rods? At the 6
clock postion is there a small dip in the wood? (cut for oiler)
The stock and cartouche date look OK too me for the serial number range.
(5MF, am I missing something?)
From your last set of pictures the bolt looks like a model 1892 bolt body/parts.
I've got the correct M1896 bolt if you want to do some tradeing.
I don't see anything major, looks like a good carbine. Let us know how things turn out.
Chuck
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thanks Chuck........I'll look at the things you listed tomorrow.
I read somewhere that the early 1896 carbines were stamped "1895" on the receiver. It would only make sense that if 1896 was the first year of the carbine that the stock would be stamped "1896" wouldn't it?
Here's something else that I found.........Looks like the same thing, with a serial number that is close to the one that I have here.
National Park Service - Detail Record
What are bolt bits ????
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
Deceased July 6th, 2010
Early 1896 carbine receivers were stamped "1895". I have s/n 26258 stamped "1895" The cartouche was stamped on the stock as a final acceptance stamp when the weapon was finished and had passed all tests.
The `96 carbine sights were not finished until early 1896 (IIRC) With that in mind "1895" stamped carbine receivers should have a "JSA/1896" cartouche.
Bolt Bits= all the parts attached to the bolt body i.e. extractor, sleeve etc.
Chuck