+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: Why Were Carbines Factory Parkerized When ALL USGI Thompsons' Were Factory Blued?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    07:40 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mpd1978 View Post
    If you see the punch style stake mark on a carbine with a flip sight-its been restored.
    That's not always true.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member mpd1978's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last On
    03-18-2023 @ 09:27 PM
    Posts
    217
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    07:40 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianQ View Post
    That's not always true.
    I guess i should have said it is probable that it has been restored or changed. Anything is possible i suppose.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    usgicollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-21-2016 @ 09:14 PM
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    448
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    05:40 PM
    Qhmc used round center punch marks on some of the flip sights they used and Inland used a chisel like stake mark on some if the adjustable sights they used.

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Johnny Peppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2015 @ 11:25 PM
    Posts
    1,810
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    06:40 PM
    Same thing on the 1911A1 pistols. Colt oven (heat) blued their pistols up until the July 1941 time frame when they changed over to phosphate. Ithaca, Remington Rand, and US&S Du-Lite blued theirs over a sandblasted finish. Ordnance changed the specifications on the finish, requiring a Type II (phosphate) finish in late 1942. The manufacturers were given time to install the necessary equipment to change to the phosphate finish, and Ithaca and Remington Rand changed to phosphate in the July/August 1943 time frame. US&S had their 1911A1 contract cancelled, and ceased production before changing over to phosphate finish.

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Tobor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    05-16-2011 @ 12:26 AM
    Posts
    17
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    04:40 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Peppers View Post
    Same thing on the 1911A1 pistols. Colt oven (heat) blued their pistols up until the July 1941 time frame when they changed over to phosphate. Ithaca, Remington Rand, and US&S Du-Lite blued theirs over a sandblasted finish. Ordnance changed the specifications on the finish, requiring a Type II (phosphate) finish in late 1942. The manufacturers were given time to install the necessary equipment to change to the phosphate finish, and Ithaca and Remington Rand changed to phosphate in the July/August 1943 time frame. US&S had their 1911A1 contract cancelled, and ceased production before changing over to phosphate finish.
    And yet Savage & AO continued the use of the Du-Lite Type III Black oxide finish on the TSMG until production ceased February, 1944. This departure from what other WWII government contract firearm manufacturers were doing regarding Parkerizing appears to be an aberration at the time.

  7. #6
    Legacy Member emmagee1917's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    11-27-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Yuma , Arizona
    Posts
    1,402
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    04:40 PM

    Another thing to consider...

    ...at this point in time , carbines , garands ,Bars, M1911s , M1919A4s , etc. were still primary , standard classed weapons. M1928 thompsons were limited standard with the M3 and M3A1 greaseguns as the then current standard. It was just unwise , with the war and all , to justify the time and expense to install the parking equipment in plants for a weapon system that would be shortly discontinued when M3 production met demand ( and the M3 was parked).
    Chris

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Tobor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    05-16-2011 @ 12:26 AM
    Posts
    17
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    04:40 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by emmagee1917 View Post
    ...at this point in time , carbines , garands ,Bars, M1911s , M1919A4s , etc. were still primary , standard classed weapons. M1928 thompsons were limited standard with the M3 and M3A1 greaseguns as the then current standard. It was just unwise , with the war and all , to justify the time and expense to install the parking equipment in plants for a weapon system that would be shortly discontinued when M3 production met demand ( and the M3 was parked).
    Chris
    It is true that the M1928A1 was reclassified as "Limited Standard" in April, 1942, but at the same time, the "new" M1 TSMG was adopted as Submachine Gun, Caliber .45 M1. Then considered as "primary standard classed weapons." By January, 1943, the M1A1icon (fixed firing pin bolts)TSMG was being manufactured. These had the same Du-Lite Type III Black oxide finish. By January 1943, AOC was told that the M3 Greaser would replace the TSMG. Had there not been manufacturing problems with the Greaser, the TSMG would have ceased production in April, 1943.
    Last edited by Tobor; 07-30-2010 at 02:48 PM.

  9. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Johnny Peppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2015 @ 11:25 PM
    Posts
    1,810
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    06:40 PM
    Late in 1944 Colt was allowed to change to Parko-Lubrite. The first picture is of a June 1945 Colt 1911A1 finished in Parko-Lubrite. The receiver and slide were not sandblasted before the finish was applied, leaving a very smooth finish, but one that shows the machine marks.
    The second picture is of an April 1945 Colt with a Parko-Lubrite finish, but the receiver was sandblasted before finish and the slide was not.
    On the sandblasted receivers care was taken not to sandblast the top of the receivers or the feed ramp which left them very smooth, and Ordnance did not require Colt to polish the finish off the feed ramp.



+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. Factory converted No 4
    By rhodders in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-24-2010, 06:46 AM
  2. Factory Parts Sharing??
    By Lance in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-07-2010, 06:13 AM
  3. Best Factory New AR ? ? ?
    By Jocko in forum M16A2/AR15A2 Rifles
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-19-2009, 09:22 PM
  4. Which factory made this No. 4 Mk I?
    By jbrid in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 06:40 PM
  5. Blued or Parkerized?
    By dt1950 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-15-2009, 11:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts