-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Inglis High Power Serial Number - I'm stumped
-
12-04-2014 11:54 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Can you take some close-up pictures of the proofmarks on the frame and slide and tell me whether the serial number has 'CH', 'T' or no letter in it?
-
-
-
Advisory Panel
I had a 3 digit gun, but it had a prefix. Mine was a 0T8XX, don't remember the whole number. Yes, we need a close up, preferably not a phone pic...
-
-
Advisory Panel
Might be a "lunch box" pistol. Assembled by a factory worker at home, (or later out of nos parts), with a non-standard serial number applied for registration purposes. They are out there and you aren't that far from where they were produced during the war.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
All original phosphate Inglis's would have had the serial number applied in the white.
It's possible someone modified the serial number and re-finished the pistol, but without close up pictures it's not possible to say for sure. We do know it was refinished at some point, by either the factory (some were upgraded to Mk 1* and refinished) military arsenal, or outside of the military.
Regards,
-Steve
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
Advisory Panel
That "T" is a JI for John Inglis. Looks like it might have been stolen from the factory and numbered later. I know handguns could be registered without problem for years, my great Uncle took his vet bringback in around 1965 and they papered it without question. This may have done the same. Nice gun.
Last edited by browningautorifle; 01-20-2015 at 12:43 AM.
Regards, Jim
-
-
Legacy Member
A few observations:
1. there should be, but aren't, Dominion of Canada acceptance marks (a broad arrow inside a "C") on the right side (S/N side) of the frame;
2. there should be, but isn't, a cross pennant marking of the barrel visible through the ejection port;
3. the factory applied serial numbers were done using a pantograph which left very neat, evenly space, all on one plane, consistent-depth markings while your serial number is uneven, off-line and not consistent;
4. there is no marking above the "BROWNING - FN 9MM HP" where the "MkI*", etc. stamping should be;
5. and - significantly (or not) the cam lug is prick-punched to keep it in place in the frame.
All the above, the last point in particular, makes me wonder who, when, and why that was done. One possible answer is also the most likely explanation. That is, as has been suggested earlier, the pistol was made from parts that "grew legs" or were poached from the factory before the S/N was applied and became accountable.
I'm not a betting man, but if I was, I would take 10 to 1 odds on it being a "Lunch-box Special".
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Paul S. For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I generally don't believe in "Lunch Box" guns, but after seeing this one I may have to modify my stance. Sure fits the bill.
-
Legacy Member
Long Branch had a rifle team, I don't know if they had a pistol team. I'd agree on the "lunch box" special or, if they had a pistol team, a piece selected and tuned for those shooters. My brother bought a lovely 7.62 No.4 with a one-of-a-kind target rear sight. There are no military or DCRA stamps on the rifle, but from the condition and little clues on the rifle as well as some research, we've concluded that it was probably made for the rifle team. If only the pistol could talk!
-