+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Qustions about (1) orig brl and (2) op slide spring

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member colreed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-21-2021 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    near Houston
    Age
    84
    Posts
    104
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM

    Qustions about (1) orig brl and (2) op slide spring

    (1) I have been told that my Std Prod 2063636 was mfg about Oct/Nov 43. The receiver has a 7 on the left toward the front. It has an Underwood brl dated 3-43. Is it likely the orig brl from the Gov't free barrel program?

    (2) When I tore it down, the op slide spring looked different. My books say the spring should be 10.25" long with 120 coils. Mine was 11.25 inches long and has only about 113 coils. Anyone know what it might be for? I don't guess it is for a carbine.

    Much thanks for your help.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member colreed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-21-2021 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    near Houston
    Age
    84
    Posts
    104
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quick correction to post above

    The Underwood barrel is dated 3-44, NOT 3-43

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Bruce McAskill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-17-2023 @ 09:10 PM
    Posts
    1,880
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Colreed, It's not likely the original barrel on a receiver made about October 1943. Replaced during a rebuild as the barrel is about 6 months later then the receiver. It sounds like your recoil spring might be a commercial replacement spring.

  6. Thank You to Bruce McAskill For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member imarangemaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-19-2023 @ 12:24 AM
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,308
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM

    Spring

    Sarco sells a "high speed recoil spring" for M1icon carbines. It is about 11 inches long, but I dont know about coil count, but it is different. I got one years ago to replace a GI one I had collapsed to 9 1/2". It sucked and was too tight and short stroked with some loads. Replaced it with a NOS GI.

  8. #5
    Legacy Member colreed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-21-2021 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    near Houston
    Age
    84
    Posts
    104
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks, IMA,
    I didn't shoot with this one. Removed it on initial teardown. Was tight and caught my attention.
    Maybe I ought to try it. Suppose it could lessen the shock at the end of the backstroke.

  9. #6
    Legacy Member imarangemaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-19-2023 @ 12:24 AM
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,308
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM

    Spring

    The Sarco spring worked great with GI ball, but did not like Aguilla and some commercial loads.

  10. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    zertouche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2011 @ 12:48 AM
    Posts
    60
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    11:12 AM
    First part in the bin, first out. Nothing is set in stone. There were over one thousand, five hundred contractors for Carbine parts, and the prime mfgs traded, sold and bought parts like there was no tomorrow. In WWII if military mfgs didnt pump out the parts like they did, there would have been no tomorrow.

    It astounds me that carbine owners will swap out a part on a CMPicon carbine with no inspection or research. Its a NPM so it MUST have NPM matching parts and a freshened up repark by Homer in his garage workshop, that also makes M1icon Carbine pistols.

    Inland sold thousands and thousands of bolts to other Carbine mfgs. That IN bolt you removed quite likely was the original bolt that rifle was produced with. But you dont have a headspace gauge and you dont really understand the difference between "go, no go and field". But hey, you got the NPM marked bolt off gunbroke and now your Carbine is "original".

    Some other schmoe bought the actual, original IN bolt from your Carbine, and now its in his parts box. Carbine mfgs got paid based on the fullfilling their contract. There was no micromanager who said "hey, this is an Inland bolt, its supposed to be Rockola".

    So you have sold the real, original parts for pennies, and swapped in worn out parts that have that little W mark and now you have nothing. Wear and finish do not match. In fact, the rifle is now unsafe to shoot because of the swapped out parts which were once original and functionable.

    But hey. All the part stamps match. Well sort of. Maybe you need to have joe joe repark it in his extra bedroom workshop in his condo. The one that caught on fire last week. He does such good work for $50. He made a nice tanker for me out of my IH Garand that swallowed some kind of bullet I placed in the muzzle. Maybe it was a 223?

  11. #8
    Legacy Member imarangemaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-19-2023 @ 12:24 AM
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,308
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM

    ?????

    Zertouche,

    How does my replacing a badly collapsed spring rate a response like that? My Underwood is the same as the day it was rebuilt. I think you meant to post to a different thread. It's not that I disagree with what you are saying. I agree with most of it. I just don't think I rated a tirade for replacing a spring.

  12. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    phil441's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-15-2020 @ 12:37 AM
    Location
    North Central Texas
    Posts
    422
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    01:12 PM
    I agree that Zertouche probably did a compose and then pasted to the wrong thread.
    When I find the one it was supposed to go in, I'll do a "thumbs up" on it.
    Aren't computers fun? And faster machines and internet service just mean making uh-ohs faster.
    Still following this thread.

  13. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Curt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-02-2016 @ 10:29 AM
    Posts
    579
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    I think zetouche has finally hit the wall probally due to humped parts,humped carbines and 100,000 owners of new CMPicon carbines all trying to restore there new prizes to WW2 issue with brand new properly stamped parts and stocks that have to be real because if they were fake E-bay wouldn't let them be sold on there right?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rear Sight Slide (Elevation) Catch Spring
    By AlReiter in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-18-2009, 03:56 AM
  2. Rear Sight Slide Catch Spring ??
    By AlReiter in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 09:26 AM
  3. Qustions About Enfield Magazines
    By Normanclature in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-25-2009, 10:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts