+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 1905 safety question

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    rim-fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Last On
    10-05-2019 @ 05:45 PM
    Location
    Pa.
    Posts
    3
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    04:53 AM

    1905 safety question

    Just picked up a "sporterized" 1905 had to remove the mag. cutoff in order for it to feed,no big deal as I would never use it. It is very accurate but the safety is very hard to engage,What is the proper way to remove it for a good cleaning?Also is it normal for the safety button to spin freely?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member oldpaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-30-2024 @ 12:19 AM
    Location
    Top left corner, between Vancouver and Vancouver
    Posts
    215
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    01:53 AM
    Sorry it took so long to answer. To disassemble the safety on the 'button' type MkII 1905. Insert a small pin punch in the hole in the top of the safety (first picture) and push down on the plunger that is beneath it. I like to do this with the button pressed on the edge of a bench to control how fast it comes apart. The MkII handbook says "With a small punch depress the safety catch plunger and while depressed lightly tap off the safety catch by the knob", but I have found that tapping it off will likely ensure the loss of the tiny spring and plunger when the safety comes out. Disassembled, second picture. If you think cleaning will make the safety easier to operate, it can't hurt but in my opinion the safety is poorly designed. In picture three the lower arrow points to the shallow angled part of the safety that pushes against the front of the striker (upper arrow) and moves the striker away from the the sear. There isn't enough mechanical advantage with the small button to make it easier. I would not be comfortable changing this angle or relieving the front of the striker because if you took too much off there is danger the striker engagement might be past the trigger sear and fire inadvertently when the safety was released. As your rifle is already modified perhaps replace the button with something more substantial. The button is a press fit and should not spin freely. Best. Tom

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to oldpaul For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    rim-fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Last On
    10-05-2019 @ 05:45 PM
    Location
    Pa.
    Posts
    3
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    04:53 AM
    Thread Starter
    Tom
    Thanks for the instructions,turns out that the loose button was binding on the bolt. Filed a little off the back of the button and it is working smooth now.

  7. #4
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,710
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    01:53 AM
    The safety button should not spin freely.

    One option for a more easily operated safety is to replicate the shaft of the existing safety but extend it out over the bolt handle with a knurled swell or collar on the end. This is more easily pushed and pulled. I have a rifle where this was done by a previous owner. A polished and case hardened shaft would be a good idea if making such. You would want to be careful not to make the tip where it engages in the receiver wall too hard or brittle.

    To improve the existing safety examine the hole in the bolt body and if it is rough, polish it smoother. Obviously you have be careful not to make it ovoid or enlarge it, but between polishing the shaft of the safety and the inside walls of the hole, you should be able to make it operate more smoothly.

    It may be that when the safety is being engaged the pressure is exerted by the inside face of the button against the rear face of the bolt handle, in which case have a look at the inside face of the button for smoothness.

    A bit of grease would help too.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 1905 Ross MkII question
    By Lucite in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-14-2015, 07:42 PM
  2. New 1905 Ross, markings question
    By Homer2 in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-23-2012, 09:08 AM
  3. IBM safety question
    By Arcieri in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-02-2011, 10:42 AM
  4. sks safety question
    By crunch in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-04-2011, 04:52 PM
  5. Safety Question
    By pigspitter in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-23-2010, 03:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts