+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Long Branch 2 and 5 groove barrels

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member x westie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    01-02-2024 @ 12:05 PM
    Location
    East Central Alberta
    Posts
    45
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 AM

    Smile Long Branch 2 and 5 groove barrels

    I find the Lee Enfield Riflesicon a fascinating subject..especially the Long Branch models...but i have to admit ..though i read as much as i can about these rifles....and read the posts on , i still have a lot to learn.....there are lots of well informed MilSurp who i can tell a very well informed on the Long Branch rifles....my question is...i have 2 LB rifles....a 1942 with a 2 groove barrel...and a 1943 with {i think} is a 5 groove barrel....would there have been several barrel making machines at the LB..factory??...some machines turning out 2 groove barrels,..while others turned 5 groove barrels..

    I wish there was more info on the Long Branch factory....would make a great book...
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel stencollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 09:58 PM
    Location
    Shilo MB
    Posts
    795
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    08:11 AM
    I think the change to 2 groove was simply to save on the cutters required on the broach, and may not have otherwise required any real change in machinery. It was an accepted change by the Britishicon to make manufacture easier, since it did not result in a unnaceptable change in accuracy.
    There was a change in the 50s at Long Branch over to using surplus Inglis Bren equipment which resulted in 6 groove right hand twist barrels.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel tiriaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 08:24 AM
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,078
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:11 AM
    Were LB barrels broached, or cut rifled using Pratt & Whitney type sine bar riflers?
    If barrels were broached, only the actual cutting tooling would need to be changed. If a cut rifler were being used, there would be more work involved in resetting the machine, althought the same cutter would work for 2 or 5 groove.
    The time required to broach 2 or 5 groove barrels would be the same. One pass, that's it. Whether there would be much savings in the tool room making 2 groove versus 5 broove proaches, I would not know. Using a sine bar rifler, a 2 groove barrel would require 40% of the machine time of a 5 groove barrel.
    I would doubt that 2 and 5 groove barrels would have been produced simultaneously, although there could have been a transition period when tooling was phased in and out.

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel Lee Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    04-27-2024 @ 03:42 PM
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    1,825
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 AM
    I have seen Long Branch's with 5groove bbls dated 1941, '42, '43, '44, '45, '49, '50, '51

    The earliest 2 groove barrel I've seen is dated '42. I can confirm '42, '43, and '44. I have heard of a 1950 dated 2 groove barrel.

    I do not recall seeing a '45 dated 2 groove LB.

    The earliest 6 groove Mk4 barrel I have is dated '48 IIRC (will confirm). It's on a 1949.

    The latest 6 groove Mk4 barrel I have is dated '58.

    Having said that, I understand that the knox form dates are not production dates, but are breeching dates.

    Does anyone have an UN-DATED Long Branch barrel??
    Last edited by Lee Enfield; 08-13-2007 at 03:26 PM.

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel Lee Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    04-27-2024 @ 03:42 PM
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    1,825
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tiriaq View Post
    Were LB barrels broached, or cut rifled using Pratt & Whitney type sine bar riflers?
    If barrels were broached, only the actual cutting tooling would need to be changed. If a cut rifler were being used, there would be more work involved in resetting the machine, althought the same cutter would work for 2 or 5 groove.
    The time required to broach 2 or 5 groove barrels would be the same. One pass, that's it. Whether there would be much savings in the tool room making 2 groove versus 5 broove proaches, I would not know. Using a sine bar rifler, a 2 groove barrel would require 40% of the machine time of a 5 groove barrel.
    I would doubt that 2 and 5 groove barrels would have been produced simultaneously, although there could have been a transition period when tooling was phased in and out.
    Wheaty has some broaches with multiple cutters...

  8. #6
    Advisory Panel tiriaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 08:24 AM
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,078
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:11 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Enfield View Post
    Wheaty has some broaches with multiple cutters...
    ALL broaches have multiple cutters. A broach is passed through the barrel only once. A broach can be made to cut any number of grooves desired. How does broaching a 2 groove barrel save time or money compared to broaching a 5 groove barrel?

  9. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    stoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Last On
    03-21-2013 @ 09:49 PM
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    35
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 AM
    Were Enfield barrels buttoned or broached? Explained:

    Lilja Precision Rifle Barrels - Articles: The Making of a Rifle Barrel

    If they were buttoned, they would have been run twice for 2 groove, and 5 times for 5 groove. Therefore a 2 groove barrel would save time and tool wear by 60%, as noted by Tiriaq.

    If they were broached, they would not save time, but they would save on cutting heads, as noted by StenCollector above.
    Last edited by stoggie; 08-13-2007 at 05:20 PM.

  10. #8
    Advisory Panel tiriaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 08:24 AM
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,078
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:11 AM
    Button rifling did appear during WW2, although I have never seen any suggestion that SAL used the process. Remington (Mike Walker) pioneered it, it was also used in Germanyicon.
    All grooves are formed in one pass when a barrel is button rifled. Its not 2 passes for 2 grooves, 5 passes for 5 grooves. The grooves are created by displacing the metal.
    All grooves are cut in one pass when a broach is passed through a barrel. A broach is a long cutting tool, with a series of cutters to cut each groove, each cutter being slightly higher than the previous one. The broach is made from a single piece of steel. Making a 2 groove broach would be faster than making one to cut more grooves, but the time taken to rifle the barrel would be the same. A broach can be used to rifle a number of barrels before needing sharpening, reworking or replacement.
    When a barrel is rifled by either button or broach, the actual time required to pass the tool through the barrel is seconds.
    If a barrel is rifled with a sine bar rifler, of the Pratt&Whitney pattern, each groove requires a series of passes to be made, a fine cut being taken with each pass. It takes several minutes to cut rifle a barrel. If 2 grooves are being cut instead of 5, the number of passes and therefore the machine time is reduced by 60%.
    Last edited by tiriaq; 08-13-2007 at 05:55 PM.

  11. #9
    Advisory Panel stencollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 09:58 PM
    Location
    Shilo MB
    Posts
    795
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    08:11 AM
    I must say this is turning into a very informative thread.

  12. #10
    Legacy Member x westie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    01-02-2024 @ 12:05 PM
    Location
    East Central Alberta
    Posts
    45
    Local Date
    04-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by stencollector View Post
    I think the change to 2 groove was simply to save on the cutters required on the broach, and may not have otherwise required any real change in machinery. It was an accepted change by the Britishicon to make manufacture easier, since it did not result in a unnaceptable change in accuracy.
    There was a change in the 50s at Long Branch over to using surplus Inglis Bren equipment which resulted in 6 groove right hand twist barrels.
    I have 1950 C No.4 Rifle with a 6 groove barrel,....it has been bedded and has a PH 5c sight......Thanks for your interesting post,....

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Do you have a 1950 Long Branch?
    By Lee Enfield in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 146
    Last Post: 01-08-2021, 02:18 AM
  2. Long Branch #4 Mk I T SNIPER !
    By Badger in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 09:51 PM
  3. Long Branch 1955
    By sdh1911 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-02-2007, 12:21 AM
  4. What safety on a 41 Long Branch?
    By Cantom in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-21-2007, 03:10 PM
  5. Long Branch, Post war?
    By sdh1911 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-15-2006, 05:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts