I guess that this is illustrative of the fact that your rifle is worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
The ad indicates that the rifle was purchased in 1957. I managed to procure a 22 Springfield during that period. They were advertised in the January 1957 AMERICAN RIFLEMAN magazine. There was a large two-page spread announcing the availability of the M1903A3, while the announcement for the sale of the 22 caliber rifles was buried in a small announcement on page 50. Both
M1 and M2 rifles were advertised with no choice-one took the “luck of the draw”. Serviceable rifles were priced at $30 plus a $2.85 packing and handling fee and unserviceable at 15 plus the same $2.85 P&H fee. It was announced that no spares were available. Mine was a M1922M1I and came with a SA 42 barrel. It was in great shape but had obviously been refinished and the barrel had been replaced. The bolt was polished and numbered to the receiver.
Herschel can provide more info that I can but I shall give my opinion. Without more detail it is not possible to determine if the rifle had been through depot overhaul or not. According to Campbell, all M2 22’s were parkerized and the one in the picture appears to have a parkerized finish which would be correct. My info indicates that the M2 went into production in 1932 so the 1933 barrel may be original. With the low serial number (<3000) I would expect the bolt to have the Type one (contoured) locking lug without the headspace adjusting screw. As well as I can tell, I believe that the bolt in the picture has the square (indicative of a type 2 or type 3 bolt body) locking lug. This would indicate to me that the rifle had been through a depot overhaul since the practiced was to upgrade all recycled rifles to the latest configuration.
This does not convince me that I have a $3000 rifle.
Just one man's opinion