+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Question on SG serial number blocks

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    CrossedCannons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    08-20-2017 @ 08:56 AM
    Location
    Horse country, AZ
    Posts
    351
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 AM

    Question on SG serial number blocks

    This is REALLY confusing me.

    Looking specifically at Ruth's table (WB p442) of Saginaw's Monthly Production, only 293492 carbines were produced, yet the SN's assigned to SG fell into two blocks spanning over 638000 numbers. So there were a lot of empty slots. What precipitated SG's transition to stamping numbers from the second serial number block from the first block which was over 400000 numbers wide?

    i'm trying to "date" a gun straddling this boundary
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by CrossedCannons; 07-28-2010 at 10:55 AM.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    03:13 AM
    Saginaw went to the second serial number block because Grand Rapids used up all the numbers assigned under the IP contracts.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ChipS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-29-2017 @ 04:55 PM
    Posts
    367
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    03:13 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianQ View Post
    Saginaw went to the second serial number block because Grand Rapids used up all the numbers assigned under the IP contracts.
    Huh? Is there a "rest of the story"? 400,000 serial numbers assigneed to S.G. in their first block and that they only made 293,592 crbines. That would leave about 106,400 in the first S.G. block for S'G' if needed. Refs say S'G' was assigned about 150,000 serial numbers and made 223,620 carbines - requiring about 73,600 additional numbers. Saginaw could have made all of their carbines at both plants and never come close to the second S.G block but we know they got well into the second block. Why? How? I'm certainly not the expert here but this has bothered me for a long time and logically I don't believe the answer is simply that Grand Rapids used up all of their serial numbers. Did Somebody else get S.G. numbers? Did Saginaw simply skip over a bunch of numbers at some point in time to get into the second block? Did Saginaw just start assigning first S.G. block numbers to some production lines and second S.G. block numbers to other lines and they all just quit where they were in each block when the S.G. contract was ended? My guess it was the latter scenario, or something close to it, and IMHO that would make dating the latter part of Saginaw production very difficulty if not impossible to any degree of accuracy without additional information. I would certainly like to hear opinions presenting any other logical solutions to this problem that I have not considered. Semper Fi.

  6. #4
    Senior Moderator
    (Milsurp Forums)
    Bill Hollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 11:35 AM
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Oregon
    Posts
    6,022
    Real Name
    Bill Hollinger
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 AM
    I think S.G. / S'G' serial numbers are the most confusing of all.
    Bill Hollinger

    "We're surrounded, that simplifies our problem!"

  7. Thank You to Bill Hollinger For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    03:13 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ChipS View Post
    Huh? Is there a "rest of the story"? 400,000 serial numbers assigneed to S.G. in their first block and that they only made 293,592 crbines. That would leave about 106,400 in the first S.G. block for S'G' if needed. Refs say S'G' was assigned about 150,000 serial numbers and made 223,620 carbines - requiring about 73,600 additional numbers. Saginaw could have made all of their carbines at both plants and never come close to the second S.G block but we know they got well into the second block. Why? How? I'm certainly not the expert here but this has bothered me for a long time and logically I don't believe the answer is simply that Grand Rapids used up all of their serial numbers. Did Somebody else get S.G. numbers? Did Saginaw simply skip over a bunch of numbers at some point in time to get into the second block? Did Saginaw just start assigning first S.G. block numbers to some production lines and second S.G. block numbers to other lines and they all just quit where they were in each block when the S.G. contract was ended? My guess it was the latter scenario, or something close to it, and IMHO that would make dating the latter part of Saginaw production very difficulty if not impossible to any degree of accuracy without additional information. I would certainly like to hear opinions presenting any other logical solutions to this problem that I have not considered. Semper Fi.
    The answer really is as simple as Grand Rapids used up all the serial numbers formerly assigned to Irwin Pedersen. You’re not seeing it because you’re not looking at the entire picture just the end state. Saginaw Gear was assigned 638,070 total possible serial numbers. They had contracts awards totaling 582,200 carbines. When Saginaw Gear took over the Grand Rapids plant they picked up an additional 150,020 serial numbers and an order for an additional 146,735 carbines. Once Grand Rapids exhausted all the serial numbers from the IP contract what were they to do? To continue production they needed more serial numbers. By that time Saginaw had used up almost half of their first block and they were out producing Grand Rapids. Assigning the remainder of the first serial number block to Grand Rapids left more serial numbers for Saginaw in the second serial number block. Had all the contracts run their course until completion the production the numbers would have been mush different. As we know things started to change in November 1943, plans were changed and shut downs were scheduled.

  9. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to BrianQ For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    CrossedCannons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    08-20-2017 @ 08:56 AM
    Location
    Horse country, AZ
    Posts
    351
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thank you BrianQ.

    So, if I understand you correctly (and have added up the numbers from Ruth's table without error), would September-October 1943 be a reasonable guess for the date of manufacture for SG #5834619?

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Winchester 97 serial number question
    By n64atlas in forum Military Shotguns
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-10-2010, 02:23 AM
  2. Restamped Serial Number Question
    By frankderrico in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-17-2010, 09:03 PM
  3. serial number question
    By garandfan1974 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-03-2010, 01:09 PM
  4. Ithaca serial number question
    By Del Hussey in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-14-2009, 11:22 PM
  5. Serial Number question for Savage No4
    By OFF_Winters in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-28-2007, 02:06 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts