No4 Mk1* LB

[berger]

I just recently picked up a 1942, 2Groove LB and I was wondering what the "value" is? When I say "value" I don't mean cash, as this rifle will stay in my collection for years to come. I am curious as to how branding and finish impact collectiveness. The rifle was branded with a New Zealand brand and it is almost mint, but the stain colour is slightly off between different pieces of the furniture. Is this a huge deal?

Berger

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Claven2]

Miscolor-matched furniture is not uncommon and won't affect value much. The NZD markings are somewhat uncommon, if anything they add a premium

[berger]

Miscolor-matched furniture is not uncommon and won't affect value much. The NZD markings are somewhat uncommon, if anything they add a premium

Thanks Claven! I won't feel too guilty when I shoot her then....being desirable an all....

Thanks

Berger

[tiriaq]

As far as the pieces of wood not having all the same colour, this was not a priority when rifles were originally assembled or rebuilt. The LB I was issued was 2-tone, birch and walnut. The rifle is 66 years old and saw service. It may or may not have all its original parts.

[berger]

As far as the pieces of wood not having all the same colour, this was not a priority when rifles were originally assembled or rebuilt. The LB I was issued was 2-tone, birch and walnut. The rifle is 66 years old and saw service. It may or may not have all its original parts.

I am curious...because of its age and year of production, is it pretty much assured that it saw action, or could it have been surplus?

Berger

[woodchopper]

'42 manufacture would have seen use.

Training was done with everything they could get their hands on because of a shortage of Enfields. There was no surplus production

[K31]

Not necessarily, I have a 1943 2 groove LB that was never used. It was stolen by a RCN sailor when he left the service in 1945. He said he wanted a rifle to take home, and figured he might as well grab a new one. He never used it, thinking that he might get arrested if the RCMP looked at the serial #. It doesn't even have any brass on the mag platform! It even has the leather washer over the butt bolt. This is NOT a fake, I have been studying L E's for years, and I can always tell a fake. The CANADIAN government was fighting a propaganda war in the early years. There are numerous photos of our home soldiers, manning isolated WEST COAST bases waiting for a JAPANESE invasion. As early as the spring of '42, they were armed with the No. 4! This while we had soldiers overseas still carrying the Mk. III! One old soldier told me that the 2 groove rifles were mostly reserved for home service, and all the 5 groove rifles went overseas. I have never been able to confirm that, but it might be true. They were making 2 and 5 groove barrels at the same time.

[Skippy]

If the '43 was never issued... Where would an RNC sailor have stolen it from?

[Claven2]

Buy the rifle, not the story...

[tiriaq]

The rifle went to NZ. It was sold surplus from there. NZ troops may have used No. 4s during overseas service, most photos I've seen show SMLEs. If your rifle is almost mint, it was used very little, if at all, and remained stored in NZ until it was sold off.
Something to keep in mind regarding surplus LB rifles - most of the ones made were shipped to England, and were part of the pool of rifles available for issue wherever needed. There is no particular reason to believe that a particular LB rifle was used by a Canadian, unless there is known provenance.