+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: 1941 Fazakerley No.4 Mk.1 missing pieces - questions, questions, questions....

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #21
    Legacy Member tlvaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    08-13-2022 @ 05:30 PM
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    340
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    05:56 AM
    Here is some info from Stratton:

    Upper Band

    First Variation:
    "This upper band is hinged at the top, with the two halves being connected by a joint pin. The halves are milled, and each half has a lug at the bottom through which the swivel screw passes. It is found on very early Mk I rifles (and conversions)."

    Second Variation:
    "This upper band is milled from a solid forging, with the hinge and joint pin being eliminated. The lugs are integral parts of the band. It is found on early Mk I and Mk I* rifles (and conversions)."

    Lower Band

    First Variation:
    "This lower band is milled from a solid forging, with the lugs being integral parts of the band. It has a noticeably rounded contour, similar to the lower band on the Pattern 1914 (No. 3) rifle. It is found on very early No. 4 MkI rifles (and conversions)."

    Second Variation:
    "This lower band is milled but the lugs are milled separately and welded in place. It has been observed on earlier No. 4 Mk I and Mk I* rifles."

    Cocking Piece

    First Variation:
    "Used on early No. 4 Mk I rifles, this cocking piece has the distinctive round button-like rear portion characteristic of SMLE (No. 1) rifles (although it is not interchangeable with them). This cocking piece is designated the Mk I."

    Second Variation:
    "Used on later No. 4 Mk I rifles, on Mk I* rifles, and on No. 5 rifles (and conversions), this cocking piece has a rectangular, or slab-sided, rear portion with three vertical grasping grooves on either side. The most commonly encountered cocking piece, this variant is designated the Mk II."

    The backsight section is a little longer, so I will not type it all, but he states that the Mk I backsight was used from 1941-42 by all of the factories before changing over to the Mk 2.

    Using Stratton's terminology, I would assume that the following would be acceptable for a 1941 Faz restoration: A "Second Variation" upper band, a "First or Second Variation" lower band, a "First Variation" cocking piece, and a "First Variation" backsight.

  2. Thank You to tlvaughn For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #22
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    02:56 AM
    Thread Starter
    Above and beyond the call of duty, tlvaughn, and very much appreciated.

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #23
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    02:56 AM
    Thread Starter
    Another question - is the serial number 259XXA correct for a 1941 Fazakerley No.4 Mk.1 (I couldn't remember the last 2 numbers)? I went back to the gun shop today to look around (I hadn't been there for a few months since being told the rifle had been sold), and the rifle was sitting in a rack in front of the counter - go figure! Whoever was interested in adding this rifle to their collection - please message me. I deleted a bunch of messages and my memory was up the creek due to Vicodin, so I have forgotten who I was chatting with regarding this rifle.

  7. #24
    Legacy Member tlvaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    08-13-2022 @ 05:30 PM
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    340
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    05:56 AM
    If the serial number does not have a prefix letter, my guess would be that it would be correct for a 1941 Faz. The serial number would make it rifle number 5,9xx and if I remember correctly, Faz made more than 6,000 rifles in 1941 (not sure exactly how many).

    I looked at my 1941 Faz (20330A) and the date is a simple "41" on the butt socket. Do you recall if that is where the date was located?

  8. #25
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    02:56 AM
    Thread Starter
    Yep, tlvaughan, and it was stamped "41", but I wanted to make sure. I was confused as Stratton's book says that only 3000 or 4000 rifles were made by Fazakerley in 1941, but you have obviously disproved that.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. Questions for Capt. Laidler on late Fazakerley No 4 production:
    By Frederick303 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 09-09-2016, 05:47 AM
  2. 1938 Model Turkish Mauser - questions, questions...
    By spinecracker in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2010, 10:46 PM
  3. 1973 HXP .303 Mk7z - questions, questions...
    By spinecracker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-05-2010, 12:37 PM
  4. New 1941 Longbranch No4 MKI and questions
    By Enfield trader in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 04-19-2010, 10:44 AM
  5. Questions on a 1941 Garand
    By epidoc in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-31-2009, 10:28 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts