Well gentlemen here she is. And for my English friends I hope you enjoy the story and the pictures.
I got this little lady in 2007 after I was laid off from a military contractor I worked for. So to use up the time I had I started working for a friend thats a gun dealer and went to all the local gun shows around my area of North Carolina.
One weekend at the Jacksonville show a man walked in with this rifle, the dealer I worked for bought her, and then I traded him for her.
Once I got her home I took a good detailed look at her. Shes a mix-master of English parts from various dates and as ironic as it was to me they were all assembled on an Argentine upper receiver.
Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
I don't know the full details, but a large number of Argentine FALs were imported to the UK after the Falklands War by the BA. The folding stock version was favoured by the SAS because it was full auto fire and could be concealed better in a car when on duty in Ulster. If you ever visit the Army Air Corps Museum at Middle Wallop several Argi FALs are on display.
If you have a "proper British SLR L1A1" you should have a UE,UF or UB serial number.
My own 1960 BSA made SLR has components from most of the RSAF factories. The butt is Slazenger from Australia. My own SLR was sold to Dince Hill when it left BA service, deactivated and retro rebuilt to 1960 spec. With wooden furniture, cooling holes and not slots.
Just in case poeple don't know. English, Canadian and Australian SLRs are inch. FN/FAL/RFI /R1 are metric. So don't swap the bits! 7.62mm Nato ammo fits all of them.
I wouldn't say that a large number of FN's were brought back to the UK. A few trophies were brought back both legally and illegally but as for being an authorised issue to any branch of the Army, I don't think that they were. Several were brought back to evaluate but you can be rest assured that being different in many ways, they couldn't be accommodated into the order of battle (unlike the GPMG's that could and were utilised). Contrary to popular belief, the one thing that dismally failed them was the folding butts because a folding butt always wears and will NEVER improve with wear. About 50 or so that I know of were converted into L1A1 look-a-likes at various Base Workshops but even they were incapable of functioning in the DP role so L60 DP L1A1's were converted from standard worn-out rifles for paratroopers to use. The look-a-like FN's - now with welded open butts and welded on UK spec flash eliminators if anyones seen them and wondered why....... went to the Navy and if I remember correctly, they were given to the Navy Cadets (or it might have been the main Navy initial recruit training centres in Portsmouth?) who could use them. But FN's wouldn't fit into the great scheme of UK Military weaponry. Or if they did, we haven't got a copy of the provisional infantry training book.
We did have a load of trials FN's in the Far East/Malaya Singapore but even these had a provisional handbook that differed from the standardised UK spec rifles/handbooks
All I can say is that rifle is one hell of a pressure fed beauty, it must be selective fire, you wouldn't need two large gas bottles for just a semi auto.
So when did the poms start using gas fed weapons and how big are the blokes that carry them?
All I can say is that rifle is one hell of a pressure fed beauty, it must be selective fire, you wouldn't need two large gas bottles for just a semi auto.
So when did the poms start using gas fed weapons and how big are the blokes that carry them?
That made me laugh so hard I almost spit beer all over the computer screen.
The numbers on the British parts are as follows.
Lower- UE58 Serialed A23747
the other parts I'll have to take the rifle down to see so I'll do that alittle later
So when did the poms start using gas fed weapons and how big are the blokes that carry them?
Must be the super-secret L1A1 flamethrower.
---------- Post added at 12:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 AM ----------
Originally Posted by LesterH
. With wooden furniture, cooling holes and not slots.
That's the laminated handguards that looked like post-1968 Australian ones, right? I've seen pictures of those on British rifles, but have seen nothing written about them. Were they Australian coachwood handguards, or British-made? And if British, were they walnut on the outside?
They ain't laminated handguards Enblock, them's the last spec plastic handguards to be used with plastic butts, pistol grips and carrying handles. They take the rounded form of the laminated wood handguards but are plastic.
They ain't laminated handguards Enblock, them's the last spec plastic handguards to be used with plastic butts, pistol grips and carrying handles. They take the rounded form of the laminated wood handguards but are plastic.
I know well the black plastic furniture--my L1A1 builder thought I was nuts when I specifically requested that he replace wood furniture on a rifle I was buying with NOS plastics!
In pictures, and a couple of British training films, I've seen handguards on British rifles that looked like laminated Australian handguards, right down to the three round vent holes instead of slots. They didn't look like they were plastic, or at least not the black pebble-finish plastic we all know.
For example, in this training film at 6:50 and 13:05, there's a line of recruits on the range with rifles that look like they have Australian handguards. What am I seeing here?
The British produced their own Laminated handguards circa 1969 - 1971, the only way to tell the difference is to look at the type of foil used on the inside of the handguards. Crinkle is Australian, smooth is British
upper receiver.
Information
Register To Reply
Originally Posted by muffett.2008
