+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: M1917 finish question (pics of rifle now added)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-09-2023 @ 10:17 PM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    It's definitely NOT a bubba finish gun. For one thing, the wood is not varnished, I had just rubbed it down with a thin coat of linseed oilicon before taking the photos I can see how it looks that way with the flash glinting off the oil, but I know my gun finishes and the finish here is aged raw linseed oilicon 100% for certain.

    As for the provenance, I know for a fact it came out of an old estate collection that hadn't been added to in 30 years. It also came completely gooped in arsenal cosmolene - even the bore, under the rear sight spring, everywhere.

    I am pretty certain it IS a refurbished rifle (more than one finish, evidence of sand blasting under the park, armorer replacement bolt) - the question is whether it's a US refinish, or if it was a military aid rifle refinished elsewhere and in what timeframe (i.e. post-WW1 or WW2 era or later?).

    It follows the pattern of a US refinished rifle except for what appears to be a "coating" applied over the receiver which has then seen wear and use. Actually, it looks exactly like the black paint finish on the very few original finish M1903MkI rifles I have come across - maybe there's something to that?

    I should also mention, there is not a single spot of rust pitting anywhere on the rifle that has been parked over. The finish is smooth sandblast, so if there was ever any rust prior to refurb, at best, it would have been superficial surface rust.
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

  2. Thank You to Claven2 For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-09-2023 @ 10:17 PM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    PS: Mystery about the receiver coating (which I intend to leave intact) aside, I'm very happy with this rifle - it should make an excellent shooter and is in really nice mechanical condition.
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #13
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    NRA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    01-12-2015 @ 09:24 PM
    Location
    Bonita Springs FL
    Age
    59
    Posts
    428
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    but ...... if it was sandblasted the finish would be much smoother? looks more sanded underneath
    Last edited by Claven2; 05-23-2012 at 06:20 PM. Reason: oops - hit the mod edit button by mistake, but your post is unchanged.

  7. #14
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    06:02 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Claven2 View Post
    PS: Mystery about the receiver coating (which I intend to leave intact) aside, I'm very happy with this rifle - it should make an excellent shooter and is in really nice mechanical condition.

    Which is surely more important than who did what when why and how to the finish - speaking as a shooter, not a collector.

  8. #15
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-09-2023 @ 10:17 PM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by NRA View Post
    but ...... if it was sandblasted the finish would be much smoother? looks more sanded underneath

    You might be thinking of bead blasting, which is a more uniform micro-finish. In-hand, it's obvious that the barrel was sandblasted, which is typical of a inter-war or WW2 overhaul in the states. It's also only parkerized (not coated with anything else) and has gone that USGI "greenish" colour with age.

    The receiver is another animal. If it looks gritty, that's the coating I was referring to. In the areas where it's worn off, the finish beneath is an identical sandblast to the barrel finish.

    For chuck: the bolt is an Eddystone-made part. I did a quick search and checked Stratton - didn't see any info about S-marked WW1-era bolts being replacements? I don't doubt it's true - but where did you come across that info? I had thought refurb-replacement bolts are usually either K or USMC marked? (not to be confused with the Corps).
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

  9. #16
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-09-2023 @ 10:17 PM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chadwick View Post
    Which is surely more important than who did what when why and how to the finish - speaking as a shooter, not a collector.
    LOL - except that I am both, so the mystery will torture me to the grave

    I wouldn't be harping on it, except its provenance of having been overhauled by a military facility is overwhelming - and yet, I've not seen any other M1917's with what is obviously something applied over the park.
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

  10. #17
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    NRA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    01-12-2015 @ 09:24 PM
    Location
    Bonita Springs FL
    Age
    59
    Posts
    428
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    what would a J on the bolt handle mean?

  11. #18
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    10:02 PM
    thats an S..and its the maker of the bolt, dont rememmber that one off the top of my head..
    so ill bet that at one time some one used mineral spirits to clean the rifle, and or gasoline..and removed the oil and grease..that would also make the phosphate clump up, and come off is it was done on a hot day..you may want to whipe some grease on it, and let it sit for a while, that will toughen up the finish a little better.
    iv seen that before when a customer trys to get the shipping grease off a nice newly parkerized weapon. they rust up pretty fast after that.
    warpath metal finishing contact info.
    molinenorski@msn.com
    720-841-1399 during normal bus, hours.

  12. #19
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-09-2023 @ 10:17 PM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    Actually, I tried acetone, varsol and lacquer thinner on the finish to see what would happen and it didn't touch it. I think the finish is a coating over top park, not clumped-up phosphate if that makes any sense? You can mechanically remove it by scratching at it with a brass scraper. It flakes off like paint chips, but doesn't react to normal paint removers.

    It's like british suncorite, but not glossy.
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

  13. #20
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    NRA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    01-12-2015 @ 09:24 PM
    Location
    Bonita Springs FL
    Age
    59
    Posts
    428
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 PM
    mine has an J? what does the J stand for?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. M44 Finish Question
    By mdrim13 in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-26-2011, 07:21 AM
  2. Question on the finish on my '03
    By LeagleEagle in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-22-2010, 08:55 AM
  3. Another stock finish question
    By Steve H. in N.Y. in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-16-2010, 09:54 AM
  4. Receiver Finish Question
    By Jughead in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 09:40 PM
  5. A Greek Finish Question
    By littledog in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-16-2009, 11:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts