+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: And now for something really different...

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    03:16 AM

    And now for something really different...

    Attachment 38830 Attachment 38829



    Attachment 38831

    Can anyone tell me exactly which type it is? I have a suspicion, but do not wish to influence you all with my preconceived ideas.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 12-12-2012 at 04:51 PM.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    09:16 PM
    No clue!

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    03:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Look at the bayonet lug, the band springs, and the trigger bow. And although you can't see it clearly, the butt has a cheek piece molding. The lock plate is flat, with bevelled edges, but behind the cock it is heavily convex.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 12-13-2012 at 05:52 AM.

  6. #4
    Legacy Member gsimmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,368
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    08:16 PM

    And now for something really different...

    Is it Frenchicon?



  7. #5
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    03:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Frenchicon style, but not French made. But it is based on the 1777 AN IX.
    That is why I listed the "unique selling points", which are slightly different on a French AN IX.
    More info:
    Lock plate 6 1/4! x 1 1/4"
    Barrel length 41 1/4" (the muzzle may have been trimmed a bit)
    Caliber now a tight .72, but the previous owner honed the barrel to remove rust, so it was probably originally a nominal .69 or .70.***

    If anyone out there has "American Military Shoulder Arms, Volume II" by George D. Moller, please take a look - I do not have this book, but have received a tip that the answer may be in there somewhere.

    ***Correction: I doubt he honed it out that much. Maybe the original caliber was .71"
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 12-13-2012 at 06:12 PM.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member gsimmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,368
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    08:16 PM

    And now for something really different...

    Of course! But my copy of Mollers books are in storage 680 miles away!



  9. #7
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    09:16 PM
    The visual clues surely seem Frenchicon/US, but the brass fittings, esp. the crazy front band/ramrod guide thingie aren't like anything I've seen. But if it's pre-1800 that's not a surprise. First suspicision would be Naval issue. Some early USMC musket? All wags at this point. No books handy for a few days.

  10. #8
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    03:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    OK, I think it's time for me to publish my guess. Which will have to do until someone digs out more books!
    Based on information in "United States Martial Flintlocks" by Rober M. Reilly, plus comments from musketologists, I observe the following.

    1) The long combined foresight/front band extending to middle band is, up to now, only know from Dutch muskets.
    2) The bayonet stud on top of the barrel appears to be a specifically American feature.
    3) Many early muskets (and presumably compents) in the pre-revolutionary America (not yet USAicon!) were of Dutch origin.

    4) The following features match a Springfield Model 1816, of which there were 3 major types. Reilly points out that, together with the contract muskets, there is a wide variation is detail configuration, and there is no single "all correct" version. This was NOT modern standarized factory production!
    a) Bayonet stud on top of barrel - all types.
    b) Lockplate flat with bevelled edges at front, bulbous/convex behind the cock - all types.
    c) Lower sling swivel in front arm of trigger bow - Type 2.
    d) Detachable brass pan - all types.
    e) Middle and rear band spring in front of bands. Front spring with stud - all types.

    So that sounds like a Springfield Model 1816, Type 2 - apart from the front band construction

    However, the butt, with a comb and molded cheek-piece recess is pure Frenchicon, in fact 1777 AnIX. But the basic French design was taken up by many countries, so this does not provide a clear origin, merely an earliest date of roughly 1801.

    My present guess is:
    A Springfield 1816 contract musket made up using Dutch parts, maybe recycled from an earlier musket.

    I would be grateful for comments from anyone with better information, and above all - pictures!

  11. #9
    Legacy Member gsimmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,368
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    08:16 PM

    And now for something really different...

    Does it have any proof marks? I know Belgiumicon made arms for just about everybody. Have you handled the musket, or just these three piccies?



  12. #10
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    03:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by gsimmons View Post
    Have you handled the musket, or just these three piccies?



    Don't worry, I have handled it. In fact I have dismantled it and gone over every piece with an eyeglass. All I can find in the way of markings are:

    A clearly stamped "BWS 39" on the back end of the barrel, about 1" from the tang.

    A dubious TT high on the lockplate, between the cock and the back of the pan (only visible when the lock is cocked) in the position where many US muskets are stamped "US".

    A "2" inside the lockplate.

    And that is it!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts